Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #1,816 of 84,120 nationally

Lawrence Park Eviction Risk: High , Fruitridge Pocket

Tract 06067003202 · Sacramento, CA · pop 4,990 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

With a score of 6.9/10, tract 06067003202 in the Lawrence Park area of Fruitridge Pocket ranks in the Elevated tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 4,990 residents. That is riskier than about 94% of US census tracts.

68% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 41% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,200 a month against an average household income of $53,837 a year, roughly 27% of income at the averages. Renters make up 51% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
8.1
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 35% Stable renters 17% Owners 48%
Tract context
Occupied units1,691
Renter share51.3%
SVI overall0.98
Poverty rate23.3%
Median income$53,837

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 4 tracts In Lawrence Park
Very High
Within parent city
90 th percentile
Rank, 90th percentileLowHigh
#14 of 131 tracts In Fruitridge Pocket
Very High
Within county
95 th percentile
Rank, 95th percentileLowHigh
#21 of 363 tracts In Sacramento
Very High
Within state
91 th percentile
Rank, 91st percentileLowHigh
#789 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Fruitridge Pocket and the region

Centroid at 38.5185, -121.4335 · click any tract to drill in

Why Lawrence Park scores 8.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Fruitridge Pocket
8.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
23.3% poverty · this tract
5.8
Supply constraint
$1,200 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fruitridge Pocket
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fruitridge Pocket
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fruitridge Pocket
8.0

How Lawrence Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Lawrence Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 8.18.1This tracttract 003202Fruitridge Pocket: 8.48.4Fruitridge Pocketparent cityCounty: 5.75.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 98

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Lawrence Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Lawrence Park

The heaviest input here is eviction process difficulty at 8.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Fruitridge Pocket, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Sacramento County average of 6.3 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is Hispanic or Latino and Asian and ranks around the 98th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

In CDC survey modeling, about 22.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 11.9% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06067003202

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067003202?

Census tract 06067003202 in the Lawrence Park neighborhood scores 8.1/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06067003202?

Median gross rent is $1,200/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 68% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06067003202?

23.3% of residents in tract 06067003202 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,990.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06067003202?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 98th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 81th, household 96th, minority 86th, housing 99th.
Q5

Is tract 06067003202 considered part of Lawrence Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06067003202 fall within Lawrence Park (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06067003202 struggle to pay rent?

About 22.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06067003202 compare to Fruitridge Pocket overall?

Tract 06067003202 scores 8.1/10, lower than the parent city of Fruitridge Pocket at 8.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fruitridge Pocket; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Fruitridge Pocket

Top eight tracts in Fruitridge Pocket ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related