Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #2,892 of 84,120 nationally
Lawrence Park Eviction Risk: Elevated , Fruitridge Pocket
Tract 06067004401 · Sacramento, CA · pop 3,846 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi
Tract 06067004401 covers the Lawrence Park area of Fruitridge Pocket in California. Home to 3,846 residents, it scores $1/10 on landlord eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #4,351 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
52% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 14% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,621 a month while the average household earns $61,443 a year, roughly 32% of income at the averages. Renters make up 47% of occupied homes.
Risk score
7.6
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 24%
Stable renters 23%
Owners 53%
Tract context
Occupied units1,533
Renter share47.2%
SVI overall0.95
Poverty rate26.3%
Median income$61,443
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
87
th percentile
High
Within state
85
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Fruitridge Pocket and the region
Centroid at 38.5312, -121.4507 · click any tract to drill in
Why Lawrence Park scores 7.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Fruitridge Pocket
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
26.3% poverty · this tract
6.6
Supply constraint
$1,621 rent vs county FMR
2.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fruitridge Pocket
9.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fruitridge Pocket
8.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fruitridge Pocket
9.3
How Lawrence Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 95
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 91%Socioeconomic
- 90%Household composition
- 84%Racial/ethnic minority
- 87%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 38%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Lawrence Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 23.5%Housing insecurity
- 13.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 29.1%Food insecurity
- 30.0%SNAP enrollment
- 15.2%Transit barriers
- 15.0%No health insurance
- 20.2%Frequent mental distress
- 38.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Lawrence Park
The score leans hardest on housing court bias at 9.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Fruitridge Pocket, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Sacramento County average of 6.3 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 23.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 13.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of C ("Declining"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 06067004401
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067004401?
Census tract 06067004401 in the Lawrence Park neighborhood scores 7.6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06067004401?
Median gross rent is $1,621/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 52% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06067004401?
26.3% of residents in tract 06067004401 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,846.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06067004401?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 95th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 91th, household 90th, minority 84th, housing 87th.
Q5
Is tract 06067004401 considered part of Lawrence Park?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06067004401 fall within Lawrence Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06067004401 struggle to pay rent?
About 23.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 13.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06067004401 compare to Fruitridge Pocket overall?
Tract 06067004401 scores 7.6/10, lower than the parent city of Fruitridge Pocket at 8.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fruitridge Pocket; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 06067004401 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Fruitridge Pocket
Top eight tracts in Fruitridge Pocket ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related