Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #15,451 of 84,120 nationally
Lexington Hills Eviction Risk: Elevated , Folsom
Tract 06067008506 · Sacramento, CA · pop 2,920 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
Tract 06067008506 sits in the Lexington Hills area of Folsom, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 6.5/10. Population here is 2,920. 100% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.
Risk score
6.5
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 47%
Stable renters 53%
Owners 0%
Tract context
Occupied units1,488
Renter share100.0%
SVI overall0.47
Poverty rate10.9%
Median income$85,278
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
93
th percentile
Very High
Within county
35
th percentile
Low
Within state
33
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Folsom and the region
Centroid at 38.6700, -121.1441 · click any tract to drill in
Why Lexington Hills scores 6.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Folsom
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
10.9% poverty · this tract
2.7
Supply constraint
$2,084 rent vs county FMR
4.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Folsom
5.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Folsom
6.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Folsom
4.5
How Lexington Hills compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 47
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 21%Socioeconomic
- 36%Household composition
- 68%Racial/ethnic minority
- 80%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Lexington Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.2%Housing insecurity
- 4.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 9.0%Food insecurity
- 7.7%SNAP enrollment
- 5.9%Transit barriers
- 5.0%No health insurance
- 14.3%Frequent mental distress
- 25.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Lexington Hills
23% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. The main counterweight is economic stress at 2.7/10. Food insecurity runs 9.0% against 17.8% nationally.
SNAP participation runs 7.7% against 15.2% nationally. Average gross rent is $2,084, 11% below the Folsom average. On the national scale it lands near the 82nd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 5.2/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.0 points cooler. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.
47% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent. It tracks the Sacramento County average of 7.1 closely. Annual rent works out to 29% of average household income of $85,278.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 06067008506
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067008506?
Census tract 06067008506 in the Lexington Hills neighborhood scores 6.5/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06067008506?
Median gross rent is $2,084/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 47% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06067008506?
10.9% of residents in tract 06067008506 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,920.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06067008506?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 47th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 21th, household 36th, minority 68th, housing 80th.
Q5
Is tract 06067008506 considered part of Lexington Hills?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06067008506 fall within Lexington Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06067008506 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06067008506 compare to Folsom overall?
Tract 06067008506 scores 6.5/10, right in line with the parent city of Folsom at 6.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Folsom; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Folsom
Top eight tracts in Folsom ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · CA
Old Town Folsom
7.6
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
Represa
5.5
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Natoma Station
5.5
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Old Town Folsom
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · CA
Prairie Oaks
5.3
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · CA
Briggs Ranch
5.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · CA
Briggs Ranch
5.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · CA
Prairie Oaks
5.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Related