Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #41,065 of 84,120 nationally
Lexington Hills Eviction Risk: Moderate , Folsom
Tract 06067008506 · Sacramento, CA · pop 2,920 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
Census tract 06067008506 runs through the Lexington Hills neighborhood of Folsom. With 2,920 residents, it scores 5.9/10 for landlords. On the national scale it ranks #22,838 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 47% of renter households, a severe level, and 23% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $2,084 a month while the average household earns $85,278 a year, roughly 29% of income at the averages. About 100% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.
Risk score
4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 47%
Stable renters 53%
Owners 0%
Tract context
Occupied units1,488
Renter share100.0%
SVI overall0.47
Poverty rate10.9%
Median income$85,278
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
93
th percentile
Very High
Within county
19
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
23
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Folsom and the region
Centroid at 38.6700, -121.1441 · click any tract to drill in
Why Lexington Hills scores 4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Folsom
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
10.9% poverty · this tract
2.7
Supply constraint
$2,084 rent vs county FMR
4.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Folsom
5.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Folsom
6.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Folsom
4.5
How Lexington Hills compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 47
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 21%Socioeconomic
- 36%Household composition
- 68%Racial/ethnic minority
- 80%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Lexington Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.2%Housing insecurity
- 4.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 9.0%Food insecurity
- 7.7%SNAP enrollment
- 5.9%Transit barriers
- 5.0%No health insurance
- 14.3%Frequent mental distress
- 25.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Lexington Hills
The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 6.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Folsom, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Sacramento County average of 6.3 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is White and Asian and ranks around the 47th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
In CDC survey modeling, about 8.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 06067008506
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067008506?
Census tract 06067008506 in the Lexington Hills neighborhood scores 4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06067008506?
Median gross rent is $2,084/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 47% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06067008506?
10.9% of residents in tract 06067008506 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,920.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06067008506?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 47th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 21th, household 36th, minority 68th, housing 80th.
Q5
Is tract 06067008506 considered part of Lexington Hills?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06067008506 fall within Lexington Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06067008506 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06067008506 compare to Folsom overall?
Tract 06067008506 scores 4/10, lower than the parent city of Folsom at 7.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Folsom; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Folsom
Top eight tracts in Folsom ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · CA
Old Town Folsom
4.8
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · CA
Represa
3.3
/ 10 · Low
Tract · CA
Old Town Folsom
3.2
/ 10 · Low
Tract · CA
Natoma Station
3.2
/ 10 · Low
Tract · CA
Prairie Oaks
3.1
/ 10 · Low
Tract · CA
Prairie Oaks
2.8
/ 10 · Low
Tract · CA
Briggs Ranch
2.6
/ 10 · Low
Tract · CA
Willow Springs
2.6
/ 10 · Low
Related