Lexington Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Folsom
Tract 06067008510 · Sacramento, CA · pop 5,036 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi
The Moderate-tier score of 5.2/10 for census tract 06067008510 reflects conditions in the Lexington Hills neighborhood of Folsom, California. That is riskier than roughly 47% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
19% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a modest level, and 6% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $3,236 monthly, set against $198,594 in average yearly household income, roughly 20% of income at the averages. About 10% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Folsom and the region
Centroid at 38.6655, -121.1202 · click any tract to drill in
Why Lexington Hills scores 2.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Lexington Hills compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 10
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 5%Socioeconomic
- 28%Household composition
- 60%Racial/ethnic minority
- 15%Housing & transportation
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Lexington Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.9%Housing insecurity
- 3.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 7.0%Food insecurity
- 6.1%SNAP enrollment
- 4.7%Transit barriers
- 3.8%No health insurance
- 13.9%Frequent mental distress
- 22.3%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Lexington Hills
What moves this score most is supply constraint at 9.7/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Folsom, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Sacramento County average of 6.3 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 6.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is racially mixed and ranks around the 10th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
About tract 06067008510
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067008510?
What is the average rent in tract 06067008510?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06067008510?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06067008510?
Is tract 06067008510 considered part of Lexington Hills?
What share of households in tract 06067008510 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06067008510 compare to Folsom overall?
Highest-risk tracts in Folsom
Top eight tracts in Folsom ranked by composite eviction-risk score.