Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #66,742 of 84,120 nationally

Lexington Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Folsom

Tract 06067008510 · Sacramento, CA · pop 5,036 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

The Moderate-tier score of 5.2/10 for census tract 06067008510 reflects conditions in the Lexington Hills neighborhood of Folsom, California. That is riskier than roughly 47% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

19% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a modest level, and 6% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $3,236 monthly, set against $198,594 in average yearly household income, roughly 20% of income at the averages. About 10% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2% Stable renters 8% Owners 90%
Tract context
Occupied units1,792
Renter share10.3%
SVI overall0.10
Poverty rate2.5%
Median income$198,594

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Lexington Hills
Very Low
Within parent city
7 th percentile
Rank, 7th percentileLowHigh
#15 of 16 tracts In Folsom
Very Low
Within county
2 th percentile
Rank, 2nd percentileLowHigh
#357 of 363 tracts In Sacramento
Very Low
Within state
3 th percentile
Rank, 3rd percentileLowHigh
#8,819 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Folsom and the region

Centroid at 38.6655, -121.1202 · click any tract to drill in

Why Lexington Hills scores 2.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Folsom
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
2.5% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$3,236 rent vs county FMR
9.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Folsom
5.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Folsom
6.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Folsom
4.5

How Lexington Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Lexington Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.52.5This tracttract 008510Folsom: 7.77.7Folsomparent cityCounty: 5.75.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 10

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Lexington Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Lexington Hills

What moves this score most is supply constraint at 9.7/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Folsom, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Sacramento County average of 6.3 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 6.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is racially mixed and ranks around the 10th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06067008510

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067008510?

Census tract 06067008510 in the Lexington Hills neighborhood scores 2.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06067008510?

Median gross rent is $3,236/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 19% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06067008510?

2.5% of residents in tract 06067008510 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,036.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06067008510?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 10th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 5th, household 28th, minority 60th, housing 15th.
Q5

Is tract 06067008510 considered part of Lexington Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06067008510 fall within Lexington Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06067008510 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06067008510 compare to Folsom overall?

Tract 06067008510 scores 2.5/10, lower than the parent city of Folsom at 7.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Folsom; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Folsom

Top eight tracts in Folsom ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related