Carmel Country Highlands Eviction Risk: Elevated , San Diego

Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10. On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 8/10. Severe burden reaches 16%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 8/10. The voucher gap is 21.5%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Food insecurity runs 5.9% against 17.8% nationally.

SNAP participation runs 4.1% against 15.2% nationally. That is riskier than roughly 86% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. At 8% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.

Social vulnerability reads 1.5/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Against average income of $250,001, annual rent is just 17%.

Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. 54% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.

It tracks the San Diego County average of 7.6 closely.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.