Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #4,036 of 84,120 nationally

Little Saigon Eviction Risk: Elevated , San Francisco

Tract 06075012504 · San Francisco, CA · pop 612 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

Census tract 06075012504 sits in the Little Saigon neighborhood of San Francisco eviction risk, California eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 7.7/10. That ranks it in the top 1% of US census tracts for landlord eviction risk, among the very hardest places in the country to operate.

78% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 22% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $573 a month while the average household earns $22,639 a year, roughly 30% of income at the averages. About 83% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
7.2
Elevated
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 65% Stable renters 18% Owners 17%
Tract context
Occupied units333
Renter share83.5%
SVI overall1.00
Poverty rate24.6%
Median income$22,639

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
14 th percentile
Rank, 14th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 8 tracts In Little Saigon
Very Low
Within parent city
90 th percentile
Rank, 90th percentileLowHigh
#26 of 242 tracts In San Francisco
High
Within county
90 th percentile
Rank, 90th percentileLowHigh
#26 of 242 tracts In San Francisco
High
Within state
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#1,838 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across San Francisco and the region

Centroid at 37.7811, -122.4130 · click any tract to drill in

Why Little Saigon scores 7.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from San Francisco
9.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.6
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
24.6% poverty · this tract
6.1
Supply constraint
$573 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from San Francisco
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
10.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from San Francisco
10.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from San Francisco
9.5

How Little Saigon compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Little Saigon risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 7.27.2This tracttract 012504San Francisco: 9.79.7San Franciscoparent cityCounty: 5.65.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 100

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Little Saigon. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Little Saigon

The heaviest input here is eviction process difficulty at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from San Francisco eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the San Francisco County average of 7.0 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is Asian and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 100th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

In CDC survey modeling, about 29.4% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 19.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06075012504

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06075012504?

Census tract 06075012504 in the Little Saigon neighborhood scores 7.2/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06075012504?

Median gross rent is $573/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 78% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06075012504?

24.6% of residents in tract 06075012504 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 612.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06075012504?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 100th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 96th, household 80th, minority 90th, housing 100th.
Q5

Is tract 06075012504 considered part of Little Saigon?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06075012504 fall within Little Saigon (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06075012504 struggle to pay rent?

About 29.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 19.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06075012504 compare to San Francisco overall?

Tract 06075012504 scores 7.2/10, lower than the parent city of San Francisco at 9.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from San Francisco eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in San Francisco

Top eight tracts in San Francisco ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related