Chinatown Eviction Risk: High , San Francisco
Tract 06075010701 · San Francisco, CA · pop 3,424 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
Census tract 06075010701 covers part of the Chinatown area of San Francisco, CA, and scores 9.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,424. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across San Francisco and the region
Centroid at 37.7975, -122.4093 · click any tract to drill in
Why Chinatown scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Chinatown compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 99
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 93%Socioeconomic
- 79%Household composition
- 97%Racial/ethnic minority
- 100%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 2%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Chinatown. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 20.7%Housing insecurity
- 11.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 44.4%Food insecurity
- 43.1%SNAP enrollment
- 18.2%Transit barriers
- 14.6%No health insurance
- 16.6%Frequent mental distress
- 48.8%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Chinatown
At $788 a month, rents run 68% under what the rest of San Francisco commands. SNAP participation runs 43.1% against 15.2% nationally. Food insecurity runs 44.4% against 17.8% nationally.
On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 10/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 10/10. 95% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.
Annualized rent equals 34% of average household income of $27,531, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. Severe burden reaches 22%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. The poverty rate is 29%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.
Against San Francisco County at 37.3%, 43% of renters here are cost-burdened. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. On the national scale it lands near the 100th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
Social vulnerability reads 9.9/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 06075010701
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06075010701?
What is the average rent in tract 06075010701?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06075010701?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06075010701?
Is tract 06075010701 considered part of Chinatown?
What share of households in tract 06075010701 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06075010701 compare to San Francisco overall?
Was tract 06075010701 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in San Francisco
Top eight tracts in San Francisco ranked by composite eviction-risk score.