Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally

Fillmore District Eviction Risk: High , San Francisco

Tract 06075015500 · San Francisco, CA · pop 3,708 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Census tract 06075015500 covers part of the Fillmore District area of San Francisco, CA, and scores 9.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,708 residents. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Risk score

9.9

High

Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 31% Stable renters 61% Owners 8%

Tract context

Occupied units2,250

Renter share92.4%

SVI overall0.82

Poverty rate20.6%

Median income$95,909

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across San Francisco and the region

Centroid at 37.7851, -122.4341 · click any tract to drill in

Why Fillmore District scores 9.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from San Francisco

9.8

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

8.6

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

20.6% poverty · this tract

5.1

Supply constraint

$2,071 rent vs county FMR

1.2

Rent control risk

Inherited from San Francisco

10.0

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

10.0

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from San Francisco

10.0

Housing court bias

Inherited from San Francisco

9.5

How Fillmore District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 82

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

54%Socioeconomic
79%Household composition
75%Racial/ethnic minority
96%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

0%Grade A
0%Grade B
0%Grade C
78%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Fillmore District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

9.0%Housing insecurity
5.3%Utility-shutoff threat
12.5%Food insecurity
11.3%SNAP enrollment
7.1%Transit barriers
6.2%No health insurance
13.4%Frequent mental distress
31.3%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Fillmore District

On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 10/10. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 10/10. This is renter territory: 92% of occupied units are tenant-occupied.

Severe burden reaches 23%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. The poverty rate is 21%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. Average gross rent is $2,071, 16% below the San Francisco average.

This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for San Francisco. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. On the national scale it lands near the 100th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Social vulnerability reads 8.4/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.

Rent takes 30% or more of income for around a third of renters. It tracks the San Francisco County average of 9.5 closely.

Annual rent works out to 26% of average household income of $95,909.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06075015500

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06075015500?

Census tract 06075015500 in the Fillmore District neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06075015500?

Median gross rent is $2,071/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 34% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06075015500?

20.6% of residents in tract 06075015500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,708.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06075015500?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 82th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 54th, household 79th, minority 75th, housing 96th.

Is tract 06075015500 considered part of Fillmore District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06075015500 fall within Fillmore District (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 06075015500 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06075015500 compare to San Francisco overall?

Tract 06075015500 scores 9.9/10, right in line with the parent city of San Francisco at 9.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from San Francisco eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Was tract 06075015500 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 78% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in San Francisco

Top eight tracts in San Francisco ranked by composite eviction-risk score.