Forest Hill Eviction Risk: High , San Francisco
Tract 06075030400 · San Francisco, CA · pop 5,262 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi
Census tract 06075030400 covers part of the Forest Hill area of San Francisco, CA, and scores 8.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 5,262 residents. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across San Francisco and the region
Centroid at 37.7470, -122.4675 · click any tract to drill in
Why Forest Hill scores 8.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Forest Hill compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 16
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 7%Socioeconomic
- 32%Household composition
- 75%Racial/ethnic minority
- 22%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 35%Grade A
- 65%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Forest Hill. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 5.9%Housing insecurity
- 3.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 7.3%Food insecurity
- 5.1%SNAP enrollment
- 4.3%Transit barriers
- 3.8%No health insurance
- 11.5%Frequent mental distress
- 21.4%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Forest Hill
On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 10/10. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 10/10. SNAP participation runs 5.1% against 15.2% nationally.
Housing insecurity runs 5.9% against 14.2% nationally. Against the San Francisco County average of 9.5, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.7 points. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for San Francisco. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
That is riskier than roughly 95% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 16% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2.5/10.
Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.3 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 06075030400
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06075030400?
What is the average rent in tract 06075030400?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06075030400?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06075030400?
Is tract 06075030400 considered part of Forest Hill?
What share of households in tract 06075030400 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06075030400 compare to San Francisco overall?
Was tract 06075030400 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in San Francisco
Top eight tracts in San Francisco ranked by composite eviction-risk score.