Parkside Eviction Risk: High , San Francisco
Tract 06075033100 · San Francisco, CA · pop 3,980 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
Census tract 06075033100 covers part of the Parkside area of San Francisco, CA, and scores 9.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across San Francisco and the region
Centroid at 37.7322, -122.4872 · click any tract to drill in
Why Parkside scores 9.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Parkside compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 28
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 10%Socioeconomic
- 57%Household composition
- 80%Racial/ethnic minority
- 31%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: A: Best
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 27%Grade A
- 3%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Parkside. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 5.9%Housing insecurity
- 3.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 8.3%Food insecurity
- 5.5%SNAP enrollment
- 4.6%Transit barriers
- 3.9%No health insurance
- 11.0%Frequent mental distress
- 21.8%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Parkside
Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 10/10. At $3,501 a month, rents run 41% over what the rest of San Francisco commands. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 10/10.
The severe-burden share is 21%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. SNAP participation runs 5.5% against 15.2% nationally. Housing insecurity runs 5.9% against 14.2% nationally.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground A ("Best"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. On the national scale it lands near the 95th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Only 11% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 3.5/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.6 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 06075033100
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06075033100?
What is the average rent in tract 06075033100?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06075033100?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06075033100?
Is tract 06075033100 considered part of Parkside?
What share of households in tract 06075033100 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06075033100 compare to San Francisco overall?
Was tract 06075033100 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in San Francisco
Top eight tracts in San Francisco ranked by composite eviction-risk score.