Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #9,433 of 84,120 nationally
Crescent Park Eviction Risk: Elevated , East Palo Alto
Tract 06081613900 · San Mateo, CA · pop 6,358 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
Census tract 06081613900 covers part of the Crescent Park area of Menlo Park, CA, and scores 7.7/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 6,358. 59% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly above the San Mateo County average of 44.9%.
Risk score
7.7
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 19%
Stable renters 14%
Owners 67%
Tract context
Occupied units1,978
Renter share33.0%
SVI overall0.42
Poverty rate10.6%
Median income$250,001
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Within county
78
th percentile
High
Within state
56
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across East Palo Alto and the region
Centroid at 37.4624, -122.1620 · click any tract to drill in
Why Crescent Park scores 7.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from East Palo Alto
8.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.9
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
10.6% poverty · this tract
2.6
Supply constraint
$2,661 rent vs county FMR
3.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from East Palo Alto
4.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from East Palo Alto
8.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from East Palo Alto
4.0
How Crescent Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 42
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 16%Socioeconomic
- 35%Household composition
- 57%Racial/ethnic minority
- 82%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Crescent Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.2%Housing insecurity
- 4.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 8.3%Food insecurity
- 6.8%SNAP enrollment
- 5.1%Transit barriers
- 4.3%No health insurance
- 13.3%Frequent mental distress
- 21.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Crescent Park
The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 8.7/10. Well under the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 1.4/10. Running hot, local political climate reads 8.1/10.
Severe burden reaches 13%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Average gross rent is $2,661, 18% below the Menlo Park average.
Adults with no health insurance runs 4.3% against 11.3% nationally. Against the San Mateo County average of 7.0, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 0.7 points.
Inability to pay a utility bill runs 4.0% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. On the national scale it lands near the 89th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 4.8/10.
Rent consumes only 13% of average household income of $250,001, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 06081613900
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06081613900?
Census tract 06081613900 in the Crescent Park neighborhood scores 7.7/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06081613900?
Median gross rent is $2,661/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 59% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06081613900?
10.6% of residents in tract 06081613900 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,358.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06081613900?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 42th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 16th, household 35th, minority 57th, housing 82th.
Q5
Is tract 06081613900 considered part of Crescent Park?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06081613900 fall within Crescent Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06081613900 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06081613900 compare to East Palo Alto overall?
Tract 06081613900 scores 7.7/10, right in line with the parent city of East Palo Alto at 7.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from East Palo Alto; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in East Palo Alto
Top eight tracts in East Palo Alto ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · CA
Stanford Hills
7.2
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Downtown North
7.1
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
06081611600
7.1
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
06081611700
7
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Downtown North
7
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Downtown North
7
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Stanford Hills
6.9
/ 10 · Elevated
Related