Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #31,159 of 84,120 nationally

Crescent Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , East Palo Alto

Tract 06081612101 · San Mateo, CA · pop 3,484 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

The Crescent Park neighborhood of East Palo Alto is where census tract 06081612101 sits, home to 3,484 residents. Its landlord eviction-risk score is 5.2/10. It lands near the 47th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 38% of renter households, a high level, and 20% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,009 a month against an average household income of $114,877 a year, roughly 21% of income at the averages. Renters make up 69% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
4.6
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 26% Stable renters 43% Owners 31%
Tract context
Occupied units1,370
Renter share69.2%
SVI overall0.80
Poverty rate1.2%
Median income$114,877

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 4 tracts In Crescent Park
Low
Within parent city
17 th percentile
Rank, 17th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 7 tracts In East Palo Alto
Very Low
Within county
81 th percentile
Rank, 81st percentileLowHigh
#34 of 173 tracts In San Mateo
High
Within state
31 th percentile
Rank, 31st percentileLowHigh
#6,254 of 9,109 tracts In California
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across East Palo Alto and the region

Centroid at 37.4605, -122.1476 · click any tract to drill in

Why Crescent Park scores 4.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from East Palo Alto
8.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.9
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
1.2% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,009 rent vs county FMR
1.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from East Palo Alto
8.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from East Palo Alto
9.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from East Palo Alto
7.0

How Crescent Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Crescent Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.64.6This tracttract 612101East Palo Alto: 8.28.2East Palo Altoparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 80

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Crescent Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Crescent Park

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 9.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from East Palo Alto, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the San Mateo County average of 5.1 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 17.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 8.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is Hispanic or Latino and White and ranks around the 80th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06081612101

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06081612101?

Census tract 06081612101 in the Crescent Park neighborhood scores 4.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06081612101?

Median gross rent is $2,009/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 38% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06081612101?

1.2% of residents in tract 06081612101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,484.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06081612101?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 80th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 52th, household 87th, minority 79th, housing 87th.
Q5

Is tract 06081612101 considered part of Crescent Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06081612101 fall within Crescent Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06081612101 struggle to pay rent?

About 17.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06081612101 compare to East Palo Alto overall?

Tract 06081612101 scores 4.6/10, lower than the parent city of East Palo Alto at 8.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from East Palo Alto; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in East Palo Alto

Top eight tracts in East Palo Alto ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related