Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #28,017 of 84,120 nationally

Crescent Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , East Palo Alto

Tract 06081612001 · San Mateo, CA · pop 4,017 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

Census tract 06081612001 belongs to the Crescent Park neighborhood of East Palo Alto, California. It is home to 4,017 residents and scores 5.8/10, a moderate reading for landlords. It lands near the 69th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

59% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 30% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,854 a month against an average household income of $123,170 a year, roughly 28% of income at the averages. Renters make up 40% of occupied homes.

Risk score
4.8
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 24% Stable renters 16% Owners 60%
Tract context
Occupied units968
Renter share40.1%
SVI overall0.51
Poverty rate7.6%
Median income$123,170

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 4 tracts In Crescent Park
Elevated
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 7 tracts In East Palo Alto
Moderate
Within county
84 th percentile
Rank, 84th percentileLowHigh
#28 of 173 tracts In San Mateo
High
Within state
36 th percentile
Rank, 36th percentileLowHigh
#5,876 of 9,109 tracts In California
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across East Palo Alto and the region

Centroid at 37.4699, -122.1506 · click any tract to drill in

Why Crescent Park scores 4.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from East Palo Alto
8.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.9
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
7.6% poverty · this tract
1.9
Supply constraint
$2,854 rent vs county FMR
3.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from East Palo Alto
8.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from East Palo Alto
9.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from East Palo Alto
7.0

How Crescent Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Crescent Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.84.8This tracttract 612001East Palo Alto: 8.28.2East Palo Altoparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 51

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Crescent Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Crescent Park

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 9.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from East Palo Alto, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the San Mateo County average of 5.1 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 51st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

In CDC survey modeling, about 22.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 10.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06081612001

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06081612001?

Census tract 06081612001 in the Crescent Park neighborhood scores 4.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06081612001?

Median gross rent is $2,854/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 59% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06081612001?

7.6% of residents in tract 06081612001 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,017.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06081612001?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 51th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 68th, household 29th, minority 97th, housing 22th.
Q5

Is tract 06081612001 considered part of Crescent Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06081612001 fall within Crescent Park (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06081612001 struggle to pay rent?

About 22.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06081612001 compare to East Palo Alto overall?

Tract 06081612001 scores 4.8/10, lower than the parent city of East Palo Alto at 8.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from East Palo Alto; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in East Palo Alto

Top eight tracts in East Palo Alto ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related