Fruitdale Eviction Risk: High , San Jose
Tract 06085501902 · Santa Clara, CA · pop 3,385 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
06085501902 is a census tract in the Fruitdale area of San Jose, CA. It scores 8.4/10 for landlords. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 9.5/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across San Jose and the region
Centroid at 37.3162, -121.9088 · click any tract to drill in
Why Fruitdale scores 8.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Fruitdale compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 28
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 24%Socioeconomic
- 3%Household composition
- 81%Racial/ethnic minority
- 66%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 16%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Fruitdale. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 12.2%Housing insecurity
- 5.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 12.4%Food insecurity
- 9.3%SNAP enrollment
- 7.2%Transit barriers
- 8.1%No health insurance
- 16.5%Frequent mental distress
- 21.3%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Fruitdale
84% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 9/10.
32% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly below the Santa Clara County average of 43.5%. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1/10. The severe-burden share is 12%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. That is riskier than roughly 93% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 3.5/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 0.9 points hotter. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.
Poverty sits at 4%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. It tracks the Santa Clara County average of 8.0 closely. Average gross rent is $2,866, close to the San Jose average.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 06085501902
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06085501902?
What is the average rent in tract 06085501902?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06085501902?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06085501902?
Is tract 06085501902 considered part of Fruitdale?
What share of households in tract 06085501902 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06085501902 compare to San Jose overall?
Was tract 06085501902 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in San Jose
Top eight tracts in San Jose ranked by composite eviction-risk score.