Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #8,138 of 84,120 nationally

Monterey Springs Eviction Risk: Elevated , Redding

Tract 06089010804 · Shasta, CA · pop 2,185 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

Census tract 06089010804 sits in the Monterey Springs area of Redding, California eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 6.4/10. It lands near the 73rd percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

51% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 31% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average household income is about $82,621 a year. About 15% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
6.4
Elevated
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8% Stable renters 7% Owners 85%
Tract context
Occupied units769
Renter share14.8%
SVI overall0.60
Poverty rate15.6%
Median income$82,621

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Monterey Springs
Moderate
Within parent city
62 th percentile
Rank, 62nd percentileLowHigh
#11 of 27 tracts In Redding
Elevated
Within county
57 th percentile
Rank, 57th percentileLowHigh
#22 of 50 tracts In Shasta
Elevated
Within state
66 th percentile
Rank, 66th percentileLowHigh
#3,076 of 9,109 tracts In California
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Redding and the region

Centroid at 40.6061, -122.3230 · click any tract to drill in

Why Monterey Springs scores 6.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Redding
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
15.6% poverty · this tract
3.9
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Redding
6.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Redding
8.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Redding
6.5

How Monterey Springs compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Monterey Springs risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.46.4This tracttract 010804Redding: 7.07.0Reddingparent cityCounty: 5.95.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 60

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Monterey Springs

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 8.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Redding, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Shasta County average of 5.4 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 60th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

In CDC survey modeling, about 9.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06089010804

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06089010804?

Census tract 06089010804 in the Monterey Springs neighborhood scores 6.4/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the poverty rate in tract 06089010804?

15.6% of residents in tract 06089010804 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,185.
Q3

How socially vulnerable is tract 06089010804?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 60th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 50th, household 29th, minority 47th, housing 86th.
Q4

Is tract 06089010804 considered part of Monterey Springs?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06089010804 fall within Monterey Springs (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q5

What share of households in tract 06089010804 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 06089010804 compare to Redding overall?

Tract 06089010804 scores 6.4/10, lower than the parent city of Redding at 7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Redding; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Redding

Top eight tracts in Redding ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related