Neighborhood · Ranked #4,396 of 84,120 nationally

Eastwood Eviction Risk: Elevated , Redding

Tract 06089011209 · Shasta, CA · pop 5,738 · neighborhood within 0.0 mi

Landlord eviction risk in census tract 06089011209 (Eastwood in Redding, California) comes in at 5.8/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than about 69% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 63% of renter households, a severe level, and 29% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,154 monthly, set against $49,569 in average yearly household income, roughly 28% of income at the averages. Renters make up 62% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score

7.1

Elevated

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 39% Stable renters 23% Owners 38%

Tract context

Occupied units2,242

Renter share61.6%

SVI overall0.86

Poverty rate16.5%

Median income$49,569

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Redding and the region

Centroid at 40.5520, -122.3477 · click any tract to drill in

Why Eastwood scores 7.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Redding

4.0

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

3.3

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

16.5% poverty · this tract

4.1

Supply constraint

$1,154 rent vs county FMR

2.2

Rent control risk

Inherited from Redding

6.7

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

6.0

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Redding

8.7

Housing court bias

Inherited from Redding

6.5

How Eastwood compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 86

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

71%Socioeconomic
91%Household composition
62%Racial/ethnic minority
86%Housing & transportation

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

15.6%Housing insecurity
9.2%Utility-shutoff threat
20.3%Food insecurity
21.1%SNAP enrollment
11.5%Transit barriers
9.2%No health insurance
21.5%Frequent mental distress
35.9%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Eastwood

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 8.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Redding, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Shasta County average of 5.4 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 15.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 9.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is racially mixed and ranks around the 86th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06089011209

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06089011209?

Census tract 06089011209 in the Eastwood neighborhood scores 7.1/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06089011209?

Median gross rent is $1,154/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 63% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06089011209?

16.5% of residents in tract 06089011209 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,738.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06089011209?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 86th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 71th, household 91th, minority 62th, housing 86th.

Is tract 06089011209 considered part of Eastwood?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06089011209 fall within Eastwood (neighborhood centroid within 0.0 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 06089011209 struggle to pay rent?

About 15.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06089011209 compare to Redding overall?

Tract 06089011209 scores 7.1/10, right in line with the parent city of Redding at 7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Redding; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Redding

Top eight tracts in Redding ranked by composite eviction-risk score.