Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #65,414 of 84,120 nationally

Tract 08013013706 Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 08013013706 · Boulder County, CO · pop 3,632

With a score of 3.1/10, tract 08013013706 in Boulder County, CO reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,632. What pushes it up most is supply constraint at 9.8/10.

Risk score
3.1
Lower
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 7% Owners 88%
Tract context
Occupied units1,596
Renter share11.0%
SVI overall0.04
Poverty rate3.8%
Median income$133,867

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In city
Very Low
Within county
12 th percentile
Rank, 12th percentileLowHigh
#69 of 78 tracts In Boulder County
Very Low
Within state
14 th percentile
Rank, 14th percentileLowHigh
#1,251 of 1,447 tracts In Colorado
Very Low
National
22 th percentile
Rank, 22nd percentileLowHigh
#65,414 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Boulder County and the region

Centroid at 39.9804, -105.4054 · click any tract to drill in

Why Tract 08013013706 scores 3.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
State baseline
4.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.8
State political climate
Colorado legislature & governorship
4.7
Economic stress
3.8% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$3,047 rent vs county FMR
9.8
Rent control risk
State baseline
4.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
State baseline
4.0
Housing court bias
State baseline
5.0

How Tract 08013013706 compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Tract 08013013706 risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.1This tracttract 0137065.8Countyavg tract in county4.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 4

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Tract 08013013706

The voucher gap is 48.0%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. It sits 2.7 points below the Boulder County average of 5.8. On the softer side, economic stress reads 1/10.

Cost burden runs 41% here against 52.5% across Boulder County. On the high side, regional political climate reads 7.8/10. On the national scale it lands near the 22nd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

At 11% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 1.4/10.

Statewide the CO average is 4.9, so this tract runs 1.8 points cooler. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 4%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

Average gross rent runs $3,047 a month. Annual rent works out to 27% of average household income of $133,867.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 08013013706

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 08013013706?

Census tract 08013013706 in Boulder County scores 3.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 08013013706?

Median gross rent is $3,047/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 41% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 08013013706?

3.8% of residents in tract 08013013706 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,632.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 08013013706?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 4th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 26th, household 7th, minority 8th, housing 4th.
Related