Census Tract · Ranked #41,065 of 84,120 nationally

Kersey Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 08123001600 · Weld County, CO · pop 3,708 · 25% of tract blocks fall in Kersey

Census tract 08123001600 sits in Kersey in Weld County, Colorado eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 5.7/10. On the national scale it ranks #28,903 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

46% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 5% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $917 monthly, set against $77,563 in average yearly household income, roughly 14% of income at the averages. Renters make up 22% of occupied homes.

Risk score

Moderate

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 10% Stable renters 12% Owners 78%

Tract context

Occupied units1,475

Renter share21.9%

SVI overall0.35

Poverty rate9.1%

Median income$77,563

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Kersey and the region

Centroid at 40.3888, -104.5352 · click any tract to drill in

Why Kersey scores 4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Kersey

4.7

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

4.1

State political climate

Colorado legislature & governorship

4.7

Economic stress

9.1% poverty · this tract

2.3

Supply constraint

$917 rent vs county FMR

1.0

Rent control risk

Inherited from Kersey

7.6

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

4.1

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Kersey

7.5

Housing court bias

Inherited from Kersey

7.3

How Kersey compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 35

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

41%Socioeconomic
46%Household composition
30%Racial/ethnic minority
32%Housing & transportation

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Kersey

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 7.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Kersey, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Weld County average of 5.4 and in line with the Colorado statewide average of 5.7. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 35th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 08123001600

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 08123001600?

Census tract 08123001600 in Kersey scores 4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 08123001600?

Median gross rent is $917/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 08123001600?

9.1% of residents in tract 08123001600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,708.

How socially vulnerable is tract 08123001600?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 35th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 41th, household 46th, minority 30th, housing 32th.

How does tract 08123001600 compare to Kersey overall?

Tract 08123001600 scores 4/10, lower than the parent city of Kersey at 4.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Kersey; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.