Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #34,278 of 84,120 nationally

Kersey Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 08123001600 · Weld County, CO · pop 3,708 · 25% of tract blocks fall in Kersey

Tract 08123001600 sits in Kersey, CO, carrying an eviction-risk score of 4.9/10. The main counterweight is supply constraint at 1/10.

Risk score
4.9
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10% Stable renters 12% Owners 78%
Tract context
Occupied units1,475
Renter share21.9%
SVI overall0.35
Poverty rate9.1%
Median income$77,563

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Kersey
Moderate
Within county
70 th percentile
Rank, 70th percentileLowHigh
#26 of 83 tracts In Weld County
Elevated
Within state
53 th percentile
Rank, 53rd percentileLowHigh
#683 of 1,447 tracts In Colorado
Moderate
National
59 th percentile
Rank, 59th percentileLowHigh
#34,278 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Kersey and the region

Centroid at 40.3888, -104.5352 · click any tract to drill in

Why Kersey scores 4.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Kersey
4.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.1
State political climate
Colorado legislature & governorship
4.7
Economic stress
9.1% poverty · this tract
2.3
Supply constraint
$917 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Kersey
7.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Kersey
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Kersey
7.3

How Kersey compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Kersey risk score vs. parent city / county / state4.9This tracttract 0016004.5Kerseyparent city4.2Countyavg tract in county4.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 35

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Kersey

At $917 a month, rents run 24% over what the rest of Kersey commands. Running cool, economic stress reads 2.3/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 7.6/10.

Against the Weld County average of 4.2, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 0.7 points. On the national scale it lands near the 59th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

Only 22% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 4.2/10.

Against average income of $77,563, annual rent is just 14%. Rent takes 30% or more of income for 46% of renters.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 08123001600

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 08123001600?

Census tract 08123001600 in Kersey scores 4.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 08123001600?

Median gross rent is $917/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 08123001600?

9.1% of residents in tract 08123001600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,708.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 08123001600?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 35th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 41th, household 46th, minority 30th, housing 32th.
Q5

How does tract 08123001600 compare to Kersey overall?

Tract 08123001600 scores 4.9/10, higher than the parent city of Kersey at 4.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Kersey; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related