Within neighborhood
60
th percentile
Elevated
Neighborhood · Ranked #71,178 of 84,120 nationally
Miramar Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 12011110321 · Broward, FL · pop 5,709 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
Census tract 12011110321 runs through the Miramar area of Miramar. With 5,709 residents, it scores 5.1/10 for landlords. It lands near the 43rd percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 63% of renter households, a severe level, and 63% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $3,108 a month while the average household earns $108,958 a year, roughly 34% of income at the averages. About 9% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
2.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6%
Stable renters 3%
Owners 91%
Tract context
Occupied units1,691
Renter share9.4%
SVI overall0.29
Poverty rate10.9%
Median income$108,958
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
35
th percentile
Low
Within county
20
th percentile
Low
Within state
17
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Miramar and the region
Centroid at 25.9751, -80.3228 · click any tract to drill in
Why Miramar scores 2.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Miramar
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.5
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
10.9% poverty · this tract
2.7
Supply constraint
$3,108 rent vs county FMR
8.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Miramar
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Miramar
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Miramar
3.5
How Miramar compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 29
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 42%Socioeconomic
- 32%Household composition
- 90%Racial/ethnic minority
- 8%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 13Total filings over 4 yrs
- 6.24%Avg annual filing rate
- 3.3%Peak (2016)
- 5Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 25% over the past 4 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 34Total filings 2020-21
- 0.6Avg monthly (observed)
- 0.6Pre-pandemic baseline
- 1.09×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Fort Lauderdale as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Miramar. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Miramar
What moves this score most is supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Miramar eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Broward County average of 5.4 and in line with the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 13 eviction filings here over 4 tracked years, with about 6.2% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 3.3% of renter households in 2016.
The tract is Hispanic or Latino and Black and ranks around the 29th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 12011110321
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12011110321?
Census tract 12011110321 in the Miramar neighborhood scores 2.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 12011110321?
Median gross rent is $3,108/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 63% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 12011110321?
10.9% of residents in tract 12011110321 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,709.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 12011110321?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 29th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 42th, household 32th, minority 90th, housing 8th.
Q5
Is tract 12011110321 considered part of Miramar?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12011110321 fall within Miramar (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 12011110321?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 13 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 12011110321 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.24% of renter households, peaking at 3.3% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 12011110321 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 1.09× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Fort Lauderdale eviction risk), 2020-2021.
Q8
How does tract 12011110321 compare to Miramar overall?
Tract 12011110321 scores 2.2/10, lower than the parent city of Miramar at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Miramar eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Miramar
Top eight tracts in Miramar ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related