Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #17,132 of 84,120 nationally

Al Dana Park Eviction Risk: Elevated , Egypt Lake-Leto

Tract 12057011911 · Hillsborough, FL · pop 5,807 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

Tract 12057011911 sits in the Al Dana Park area of Egypt Lake-Leto, FL, carrying an eviction-risk score of 6.2/10. Population here is 5,807. The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 9.3/10.

Risk score
6.2
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 46% Stable renters 24% Owners 30%
Tract context
Occupied units2,494
Renter share69.6%
SVI overall0.95
Poverty rate22.1%
Median income$46,500

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Al Dana Park
Moderate
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 9 tracts In Egypt Lake-Leto
Very High
Within county
99 th percentile
Rank, 99th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 333 tracts In Hillsborough
Very High
Within state
98 th percentile
Rank, 98th percentileLowHigh
#108 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Egypt Lake-Leto and the region

Centroid at 28.0019, -82.4948 · click any tract to drill in

Why Al Dana Park scores 6.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Egypt Lake-Leto
5.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
22.1% poverty · this tract
5.5
Supply constraint
$1,390 rent vs county FMR
2.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Egypt Lake-Leto
8.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Egypt Lake-Leto
9.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Egypt Lake-Leto
7.8

How Al Dana Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Al Dana Park risk score vs. parent city / county / state6.2This tracttract 0119114.8Egypt Lake-Letoparent city4.2Countyavg tract in county4.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 95

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 665Total filings 2020-21
  • 9.1Avg monthly (observed)
  • 10.1Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.90×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-01-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Tacoma, WA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Al Dana Park

Against Hillsborough County at 51.5%, roughly two in three of renters here are cost-burdened. Severe burden reaches 27%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Annualized rent equals 36% of average household income of $46,500, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. It sits 2.0 points above the Hillsborough County average of 4.2.

Running cool, state political climate reads 1.5/10. 70% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Adults with no health insurance runs 27.0% against 11.3% nationally.

On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.4/10. The poverty rate is 22%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

That is riskier than roughly 80% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 9.5/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Statewide the FL average is 4.1, so this tract runs 2.1 points hotter. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 12057011911

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12057011911?

Census tract 12057011911 in the Al Dana Park neighborhood scores 6.2/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 12057011911?

Median gross rent is $1,390/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 65% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 12057011911?

22.1% of residents in tract 12057011911 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,807.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 12057011911?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 95th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 94th, household 73th, minority 83th, housing 94th.
Q5

Is tract 12057011911 considered part of Al Dana Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12057011911 fall within Al Dana Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 12057011911 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.90× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tacoma, WA), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 12057011911 compare to Egypt Lake-Leto overall?

Tract 12057011911 scores 6.2/10, higher than the parent city of Egypt Lake-Leto at 4.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Egypt Lake-Leto; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Egypt Lake-Leto

Top eight tracts in Egypt Lake-Leto ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related