Neighborhood · Ranked #22,213 of 84,120 nationally
Al Dana Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Egypt Lake-Leto
Tract 12057011911 ·
Hillsborough, FL · pop 5,807 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
How risky is the Al Dana Park neighborhood of Egypt Lake-Leto for landlords? Census tract 12057011911 scores $1/10, the Elevated tier. That is riskier than about 75% of US census tracts.
65% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 27% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,390 monthly, set against $46,500 in average yearly household income, roughly 36% of income at the averages. Renters make up 70% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.
Risk score
5.2
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 46%Stable renters 24%Owners 30%
Tract context
Occupied units2,494
Renter share69.6%
SVI overall0.95
Poverty rate22.1%
Median income$46,500
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Al Dana Park
Moderate
Within parent city
88th percentile
#2 of 9 tracts In Egypt Lake-Leto
High
Within county
88th percentile
#40 of 333 tracts In Hillsborough
High
Within state
90th percentile
#523 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Egypt Lake-Leto and the region
Centroid at 28.0019, -82.4948 · click any tract to drill in
Why Al Dana Park scores 5.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Egypt Lake-Leto
5.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
22.1% poverty · this tract
5.5
Supply constraint
$1,390 rent vs county FMR
2.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Egypt Lake-Leto
8.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Egypt Lake-Leto
9.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Egypt Lake-Leto
7.8
How Al Dana Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 95
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
94%Socioeconomic
73%Household composition
83%Racial/ethnic minority
94%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
665Total filings 2020-21
9.1Avg monthly (observed)
10.1Pre-pandemic baseline
0.90×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2026-01-01
Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Tacoma, WA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Al Dana Park
The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 9.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Egypt Lake-Leto, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Hillsborough County average of 5.1 and above the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is Hispanic or Latino and White and ranks around the 95th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.90x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, a little under the pre-pandemic norm.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 12057011911
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12057011911?
Census tract 12057011911 in the Al Dana Park neighborhood scores 5.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 12057011911?
Median gross rent is $1,390/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 65% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 12057011911?
22.1% of residents in tract 12057011911 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,807.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 12057011911?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 95th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 94th, household 73th, minority 83th, housing 94th.
Q5
Is tract 12057011911 considered part of Al Dana Park?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12057011911 fall within Al Dana Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6
Did eviction filings in tract 12057011911 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 0.90× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tacoma, WA), 2020-2021.
Q7
How does tract 12057011911 compare to Egypt Lake-Leto overall?
Tract 12057011911 scores 5.2/10, higher than the parent city of Egypt Lake-Leto at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Egypt Lake-Leto; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Egypt Lake-Leto
Top eight tracts in Egypt Lake-Leto ranked by composite eviction-risk score.