Neighborhood · Ranked #46,312 of 84,120 nationally
Roser Park Eviction Risk: Lower , St. Petersburg
Tract 12103028601 ·
Pinellas, FL · pop 2,937 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi
For landlords sizing up the Roser Park neighborhood of St. Petersburg, census tract 12103028601 carries a moderate eviction-risk score of 4.7/10. On the national scale it ranks #59,420 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
About 51% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 26% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,511 a month against an average household income of $55,972 a year, roughly 32% of income at the averages. Renters make up 91% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.
Risk score
3.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 46%Stable renters 45%Owners 9%
Tract context
Occupied units2,377
Renter share91.1%
SVI overall0.61
Poverty rate11.9%
Median income$55,972
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Roser Park
Moderate
Within parent city
68th percentile
#25 of 77 tracts In St. Petersburg
Elevated
Within county
64th percentile
#98 of 273 tracts In Pinellas
Elevated
Within state
60th percentile
#2,057 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across St. Petersburg and the region
Centroid at 27.7651, -82.6428 · click any tract to drill in
Why Roser Park scores 3.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from St. Petersburg
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.0
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
11.9% poverty · this tract
3.0
Supply constraint
$1,511 rent vs county FMR
2.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from St. Petersburg
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from St. Petersburg
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from St. Petersburg
4.0
How Roser Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 61
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
66%Socioeconomic
11%Household composition
51%Racial/ethnic minority
86%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
0%Grade A
0%Grade B
43%Grade C
36%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
257Total filings 2020-21
3.5Avg monthly (observed)
4.7Pre-pandemic baseline
0.75×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2026-01-01
Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Tacoma, WA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Roser Park
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 4.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from St. Petersburg eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Pinellas County average of 4.8 and in line with the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 61st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
Part of this tract, about 36% of its area, sat in the redlined grade-D zone on 1930s HOLC maps, though its dominant grade was C ("Declining"). That lending history still correlates with present-day rent burden.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 12103028601
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12103028601?
Census tract 12103028601 in the Roser Park neighborhood scores 3.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 12103028601?
Median gross rent is $1,511/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 51% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 12103028601?
11.9% of residents in tract 12103028601 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,937.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 12103028601?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 61th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 66th, household 11th, minority 51th, housing 86th.
Q5
Is tract 12103028601 considered part of Roser Park?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12103028601 fall within Roser Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6
Did eviction filings in tract 12103028601 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 0.75× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tacoma, WA), 2020-2021.
Q7
How does tract 12103028601 compare to St. Petersburg overall?
Tract 12103028601 scores 3.7/10, higher than the parent city of St. Petersburg at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from St. Petersburg eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 12103028601 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 36% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in St. Petersburg
Top eight tracts in St. Petersburg ranked by composite eviction-risk score.