Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #24,859 of 84,120 nationally
Carver Village Eviction Risk: Moderate , Savannah
Tract 13051000601 · Chatham County, GA · pop 4,974 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
With a score of 5.4/10, tract 13051000601 in the Carver Village area of Savannah, GA reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 4,974 residents. Set annual rent against average income of $29,632 and the ratio lands at 52%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.
Risk score
5.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 26%
Stable renters 37%
Owners 37%
Tract context
Occupied units1,479
Renter share62.5%
SVI overall0.95
Poverty rate24.2%
Median income$29,632
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
85
th percentile
High
Within county
93
th percentile
Very High
Within state
86
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Savannah and the region
Centroid at 32.0797, -81.1166 · click any tract to drill in
Why Carver Village scores 5.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Savannah
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
24.2% poverty · this tract
6.1
Supply constraint
$1,278 rent vs county FMR
3.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Savannah
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Savannah
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Savannah
3.5
How Carver Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 95
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 98%Socioeconomic
- 49%Household composition
- 83%Racial/ethnic minority
- 95%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 19%Grade B
- 21%Grade C
- 3%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 153Total filings over 1 yrs
- 20.35%Avg annual filing rate
- 20.4%Peak (2011)
- 153Filings in 2011 (latest validated)
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Carver Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 25.8%Housing insecurity
- 17.5%Utility-shutoff threat
- 35.7%Food insecurity
- 31.2%SNAP enrollment
- 19.3%Transit barriers
- 18.3%No health insurance
- 23.5%Frequent mental distress
- 38.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Carver Village
What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 9.6/10. Running cool, rent-regulation exposure reads 1/10.
The severe-burden share is 21%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. On the softer side, state political climate reads 2/10. The poverty rate is 24%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.
Against the Chatham County average of 4.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.3 points. Housing insecurity runs 25.8% against 14.2% nationally.
Cost burden runs 41% here against 46.6% across Chatham County. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 153 filings here across 1 tracked years. Adults with no health insurance runs 18.3% against 11.3% nationally.
Filings peaked in 2011 at 20.4% of renter households. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 13051000601
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13051000601?
Census tract 13051000601 in the Carver Village neighborhood scores 5.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 13051000601?
Median gross rent is $1,278/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 41% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 13051000601?
24.2% of residents in tract 13051000601 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,974.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 13051000601?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 95th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 98th, household 49th, minority 83th, housing 95th.
Q5
Is tract 13051000601 considered part of Carver Village?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13051000601 fall within Carver Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13051000601?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 153 eviction filings across 1 validated years in tract 13051000601 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 20.35% of renter households, peaking at 20.4% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 13051000601 struggle to pay rent?
About 25.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 17.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 13051000601 compare to Savannah overall?
Tract 13051000601 scores 5.4/10, higher than the parent city of Savannah at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Savannah eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 13051000601 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 3% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Savannah
Top eight tracts in Savannah ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · GA
Ardsley Park-Chatham Crescent Historic District
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · GA
13051010818
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · GA
Windward
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · GA
Carver Village
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · GA
Ardsley Park-Chatham Crescent Historic District
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · GA
13051004300
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · GA
Tatumsville
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · GA
Spring Hill
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Related