Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #24,926 of 84,120 nationally

Mountain View Plaza Eviction Risk: Moderate , Forest Park

Tract 13063040302 · Clayton County, GA · pop 5,560 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

Census tract 13063040302 covers Mountain View Plaza in Forest Park, home to 5,560 residents. For landlords it grades 6.9/10, an elevated reading. On the national scale it ranks #5,567 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 54% of renter households, a severe level, and 24% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,112 a month against an average household income of $45,791 a year, roughly 29% of income at the averages. About 74% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 40% Stable renters 34% Owners 26%
Tract context
Occupied units1,908
Renter share74.3%
SVI overall0.94
Poverty rate20.7%
Median income$45,791

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Mountain View Plaza
Moderate
Within parent city
83 th percentile
Rank, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#2 of 7 tracts In Forest Park
High
Within county
77 th percentile
Rank, 77th percentileLowHigh
#17 of 70 tracts In Clayton County
High
Within state
78 th percentile
Rank, 78th percentileLowHigh
#614 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Forest Park and the region

Centroid at 33.6333, -84.3720 · click any tract to drill in

Why Mountain View Plaza scores 5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Forest Park
8.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.5
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
20.7% poverty · this tract
5.2
Supply constraint
$1,112 rent vs county FMR
1.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Forest Park
7.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Forest Park
9.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Forest Park
7.2

How Mountain View Plaza compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Mountain View Plaza risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.05.0This tracttract 040302Forest Park: 2.82.8Forest Parkparent cityCounty: 4.44.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 94

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 5,520Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 56.18%Avg annual filing rate
  • 69.2%Peak (2002)
  • 496Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 130630403022002: 712 filings (69.22/100 renter HHs)2005: 425 filings (48.52/100 renter HHs)2007: 432 filings (49.32/100 renter HHs)2008: 538 filings (61.42/100 renter HHs)2010: 422 filings (46.12/100 renter HHs)2011: 445 filings (54.33/100 renter HHs)2012: 499 filings (60.93/100 renter HHs)2013: 563 filings (68.74/100 renter HHs)2014: 515 filings (62.88/100 renter HHs)2015: 473 filings (57.75/100 renter HHs)2016: 496 filings (38.75/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 30% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 2,020Total filings 2020-21
  • 26.6Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 52 filings (520.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 37 filings (370.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 40 filings (400.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 34 filings (340.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 40 filings (400.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 67 filings (670.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 56 filings (560.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 38 filings (380.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 34 filings (340.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 31 filings (310.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 47 filings (470.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 39 filings (390.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 44 filings (440.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 52 filings (520.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 59 filings (590.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 47 filings (470.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 46 filings (460.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 35 filings (350.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 40 filings (400.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 54 filings (540.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 59 filings (590.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 32 filings (320.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 35 filings (350.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 37 filings (370.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 30 filings (300.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 40 filings (400.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 24 filings (240.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 24 filings (240.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 51 filings (510.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 24 filings (240.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 30 filings (300.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 47 filings (470.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 26 filings (260.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 60 filings (600.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Mountain View Plaza

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 9.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Forest Park eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Clayton County average of 6.4 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is Black and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 94th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 5,520 eviction filings here over 11 tracked years, with about 56.2% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 69.2% of renter households in 2002.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 13063040302

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13063040302?

Census tract 13063040302 in the Mountain View Plaza neighborhood scores 5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13063040302?

Median gross rent is $1,112/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 54% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13063040302?

20.7% of residents in tract 13063040302 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,560.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13063040302?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 94th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 98th, household 86th, minority 90th, housing 73th.
Q5

Is tract 13063040302 considered part of Mountain View Plaza?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13063040302 fall within Mountain View Plaza (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13063040302?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 5,520 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 13063040302 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 56.18% of renter households, peaking at 69.2% in 2002. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13063040302 struggle to pay rent?

About 32.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 22.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13063040302 compare to Forest Park overall?

Tract 13063040302 scores 5/10, higher than the parent city of Forest Park at 2.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Forest Park eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Forest Park

Top eight tracts in Forest Park ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related