Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #26,446 of 84,120 nationally

Oak Forest Eviction Risk: Moderate , Forest Park

Tract 13063040308 · Clayton County, GA · pop 4,361 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

With a score of 6.8/10, tract 13063040308 in the Oak Forest neighborhood of Forest Park ranks in the Elevated tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 4,361 residents. That is riskier than about 92% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 63% of renter households, a severe level, and 32% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,043 monthly, set against $34,032 in average yearly household income, roughly 37% of income at the averages. About 56% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
4.9
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 35% Stable renters 20% Owners 45%
Tract context
Occupied units1,685
Renter share55.7%
SVI overall0.96
Poverty rate15.9%
Median income$34,032

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Oak Forest
Very High
Within parent city
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 7 tracts In Forest Park
Elevated
Within county
74 th percentile
Rank, 74th percentileLowHigh
#19 of 70 tracts In Clayton County
Elevated
Within state
77 th percentile
Rank, 77th percentileLowHigh
#658 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Forest Park and the region

Centroid at 33.6372, -84.3896 · click any tract to drill in

Why Oak Forest scores 4.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Forest Park
8.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.5
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
15.9% poverty · this tract
4.0
Supply constraint
$1,043 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Forest Park
7.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Forest Park
9.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Forest Park
7.2

How Oak Forest compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Oak Forest risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.94.9This tracttract 040308Forest Park: 2.82.8Forest Parkparent cityCounty: 4.44.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 96

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 2,104Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 22.20%Avg annual filing rate
  • 21.3%Peak (2016)
  • 250Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 130630403082002: 101 filings (13.08/100 renter HHs)2005: 152 filings (22.40/100 renter HHs)2007: 187 filings (27.55/100 renter HHs)2008: 182 filings (26.82/100 renter HHs)2010: 190 filings (20.39/100 renter HHs)2011: 198 filings (21.41/100 renter HHs)2012: 189 filings (20.43/100 renter HHs)2013: 229 filings (24.76/100 renter HHs)2014: 177 filings (19.14/100 renter HHs)2015: 249 filings (26.92/100 renter HHs)2016: 250 filings (21.29/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 148% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 1,058Total filings 2020-21
  • 13.9Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 38 filings (380.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 30 filings (300.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 24 filings (240.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 24 filings (240.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 24 filings (240.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 28 filings (280.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 24 filings (240.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Oak Forest. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Oak Forest

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 9.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Forest Park eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Clayton County average of 6.4 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 2,104 eviction filings here over 11 tracked years, with about 22.2% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 21.3% of renter households in 2016.

In CDC survey modeling, about 27.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 18.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 13063040308

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13063040308?

Census tract 13063040308 in the Oak Forest neighborhood scores 4.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13063040308?

Median gross rent is $1,043/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 63% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13063040308?

15.9% of residents in tract 13063040308 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,361.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13063040308?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 96th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 95th, household 84th, minority 88th, housing 91th.
Q5

Is tract 13063040308 considered part of Oak Forest?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13063040308 fall within Oak Forest (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13063040308?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 2,104 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 13063040308 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 22.20% of renter households, peaking at 21.3% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13063040308 struggle to pay rent?

About 27.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 18.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13063040308 compare to Forest Park overall?

Tract 13063040308 scores 4.9/10, higher than the parent city of Forest Park at 2.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Forest Park eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Forest Park

Top eight tracts in Forest Park ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related