Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #15,522 of 84,120 nationally

Oak Village Eviction Risk: Moderate , Riverdale

Tract 13063040519 · Clayton County, GA · pop 5,031 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

Eviction risk in the Oak Village area of Riverdale centers on tract 13063040519, which scores 6.3/10 (Elevated tier) and is home to 5,031 residents. That is riskier than roughly 83% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 55% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 31% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,225 a month while the average household earns $42,068 a year, roughly 35% of income at the averages. About 100% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
5.7
Moderate
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 55% Stable renters 45% Owners 0%
Tract context
Occupied units2,582
Renter share100.0%
SVI overall0.80
Poverty rate31.2%
Median income$42,068

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Oak Village
Very High
Within county
93 th percentile
Rank, 93rd percentileLowHigh
#6 of 70 tracts In Clayton County
Very High
Within state
90 th percentile
Rank, 90th percentileLowHigh
#284 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
High
National
82 th percentile
Rank, 82nd percentileLowHigh
#15,522 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Riverdale and the region

Centroid at 33.5916, -84.4177 · click any tract to drill in

Why Oak Village scores 5.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Riverdale
2.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.5
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
31.2% poverty · this tract
7.8
Supply constraint
$1,225 rent vs county FMR
1.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Riverdale
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Riverdale
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Riverdale
5.0

How Oak Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Oak Village risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.75.7This tracttract 040519Riverdale: 2.62.6Riverdaleparent cityCounty: 4.44.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 80

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 6,911Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 42.46%Avg annual filing rate
  • 39.3%Peak (2011)
  • 509Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 130630405192002: 408 filings (39.08/100 renter HHs)2005: 755 filings (78.60/100 renter HHs)2007: 595 filings (61.94/100 renter HHs)2008: 634 filings (66.00/100 renter HHs)2010: 755 filings (38.23/100 renter HHs)2011: 791 filings (39.29/100 renter HHs)2012: 694 filings (34.48/100 renter HHs)2013: 647 filings (32.14/100 renter HHs)2014: 551 filings (27.37/100 renter HHs)2015: 572 filings (28.42/100 renter HHs)2016: 509 filings (21.49/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 25% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 5,458Total filings 2020-21
  • 71.8Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 121 filings (1,210.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 96 filings (960.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 63 filings (630.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 54 filings (540.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 42 filings (420.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 38 filings (380.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 48 filings (480.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 70 filings (700.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 55 filings (550.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 78 filings (780.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 45 filings (450.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 74 filings (740.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 33 filings (330.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 42 filings (420.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 91 filings (910.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 89 filings (890.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 60 filings (600.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 64 filings (640.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 44 filings (440.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 94 filings (940.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 68 filings (680.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 66 filings (660.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 97 filings (970.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 78 filings (780.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 119 filings (1,190.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 68 filings (680.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 54 filings (540.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 76 filings (760.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 74 filings (740.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 168 filings (1,680.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 48 filings (480.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 69 filings (690.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 61 filings (610.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 108 filings (1,080.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 139 filings (1,390.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 73 filings (730.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 54 filings (540.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 83 filings (830.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 107 filings (1,070.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 97 filings (970.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 104 filings (1,040.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 105 filings (1,050.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 108 filings (1,080.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 97 filings (970.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 81 filings (810.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 86 filings (860.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 53 filings (530.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 75 filings (750.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 72 filings (720.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 90 filings (900.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 86 filings (860.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 72 filings (720.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 58 filings (580.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 64 filings (640.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 70 filings (700.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 47 filings (470.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 88 filings (880.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 74 filings (740.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 56 filings (560.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 58 filings (580.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 105 filings (1,050.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 125 filings (1,250.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 105 filings (1,050.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 38 filings (380.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 74 filings (740.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 146 filings (1,460.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 69 filings (690.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 49 filings (490.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 58 filings (580.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 56 filings (560.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Oak Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Oak Village

The heaviest input here is economic stress at 7.8/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Riverdale, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Clayton County average of 6.4 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 34.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 25.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 80th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 13063040519

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13063040519?

Census tract 13063040519 in the Oak Village neighborhood scores 5.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13063040519?

Median gross rent is $1,225/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 55% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13063040519?

31.2% of residents in tract 13063040519 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,031.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13063040519?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 80th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 94th, household 36th, minority 98th, housing 54th.
Q5

Is tract 13063040519 considered part of Oak Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13063040519 fall within Oak Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13063040519?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 6,911 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 13063040519 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 42.46% of renter households, peaking at 39.3% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13063040519 struggle to pay rent?

About 34.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 25.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13063040519 compare to Riverdale overall?

Tract 13063040519 scores 5.7/10, higher than the parent city of Riverdale at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Riverdale; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related