Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #22,681 of 84,120 nationally
Oak Village Eviction Risk: Moderate , Riverdale
Tract 13063040519 · Clayton County, GA · pop 5,031 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
Census tract 13063040519 covers part of the Oak Village area of Clayton County, GA, and scores 5.6/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 5,031. The dominant input is court filing pressure at 9.9/10.
Risk score
5.6
Moderate
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 55%
Stable renters 45%
Owners 0%
Tract context
Occupied units2,582
Renter share100.0%
SVI overall0.80
Poverty rate31.2%
Median income$42,068
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
86
th percentile
High
Within state
89
th percentile
High
National
73
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Riverdale and the region
Centroid at 33.5916, -84.4177 · click any tract to drill in
Why Oak Village scores 5.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Riverdale
2.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.5
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
31.2% poverty · this tract
7.8
Supply constraint
$1,225 rent vs county FMR
1.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Riverdale
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Riverdale
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Riverdale
5.0
How Oak Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 80
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 94%Socioeconomic
- 36%Household composition
- 98%Racial/ethnic minority
- 54%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 6,911Total filings over 11 yrs
- 42.46%Avg annual filing rate
- 39.3%Peak (2011)
- 509Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 25% over the past 11 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 5,458Total filings 2020-21
- 71.8Avg monthly (observed)
- 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Oak Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 34.7%Housing insecurity
- 25.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 39.5%Food insecurity
- 38.0%SNAP enrollment
- 20.9%Transit barriers
- 16.4%No health insurance
- 23.4%Frequent mental distress
- 35.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Oak Village
This is renter territory: 100% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. 31% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Food insecurity runs 39.5% against 17.8% nationally. Housing insecurity runs 34.7% against 14.2% nationally. Set annual rent against average income of $42,068 and the ratio lands at 35%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.
Sitting well above the midpoint, regional political climate reads 8.5/10. The poverty rate is 31%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. Running cool, supply constraint reads 1.7/10.
Against the Clayton County average of 4.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.2 points. The filing record is not thin: 6,911 evictions over 11 years of observation. Filings peaked in 2011 at 39.3% of renter households.
In a typical year about 42.5% of renter households face a filing.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 13063040519
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13063040519?
Census tract 13063040519 in the Oak Village neighborhood scores 5.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 13063040519?
Median gross rent is $1,225/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 55% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 13063040519?
31.2% of residents in tract 13063040519 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,031.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 13063040519?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 80th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 94th, household 36th, minority 98th, housing 54th.
Q5
Is tract 13063040519 considered part of Oak Village?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13063040519 fall within Oak Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13063040519?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 6,911 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 13063040519 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 42.46% of renter households, peaking at 39.3% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 13063040519 struggle to pay rent?
About 34.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 25.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 13063040519 compare to Riverdale overall?
Tract 13063040519 scores 5.6/10, higher than the parent city of Riverdale at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Riverdale; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related