Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #15,522 of 84,120 nationally

Oak Village Eviction Risk: Moderate , Riverdale

Tract 13063040522 · Clayton County, GA · pop 4,992 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

Census tract 13063040522 covers Oak Village in Riverdale, home to 4,992 residents. For landlords it grades 7.3/10, an elevated reading. It lands near the 98th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

62% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 39% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,177 a month against an average household income of $46,528 a year, roughly 30% of income at the averages. Renters make up 65% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
5.7
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 40% Stable renters 25% Owners 35%
Tract context
Occupied units1,744
Renter share64.8%
SVI overall0.99
Poverty rate31.7%
Median income$46,528

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Oak Village
Moderate
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 12 tracts In Riverdale
Very High
Within county
96 th percentile
Rank, 96th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 70 tracts In Clayton County
Very High
Within state
90 th percentile
Rank, 90th percentileLowHigh
#284 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Riverdale and the region

Centroid at 33.5870, -84.4020 · click any tract to drill in

Why Oak Village scores 5.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Riverdale
8.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.5
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
31.7% poverty · this tract
7.9
Supply constraint
$1,177 rent vs county FMR
1.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Riverdale
7.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Riverdale
8.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Riverdale
6.8

How Oak Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Oak Village risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.75.7This tracttract 040522Riverdale: 2.62.6Riverdaleparent cityCounty: 4.44.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 99

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 5,251Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 47.66%Avg annual filing rate
  • 72.2%Peak (2007)
  • 371Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 130630405222002: 455 filings (54.92/100 renter HHs)2005: 455 filings (56.04/100 renter HHs)2007: 586 filings (72.17/100 renter HHs)2008: 563 filings (69.34/100 renter HHs)2010: 571 filings (55.93/100 renter HHs)2011: 569 filings (46.60/100 renter HHs)2012: 413 filings (33.82/100 renter HHs)2013: 388 filings (31.78/100 renter HHs)2014: 417 filings (34.15/100 renter HHs)2015: 463 filings (37.92/100 renter HHs)2016: 371 filings (31.55/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 18% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 2,656Total filings 2020-21
  • 35.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 46 filings (460.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 56 filings (560.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 72 filings (720.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 40 filings (400.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 37 filings (370.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 31 filings (310.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 46 filings (460.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 38 filings (380.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 47 filings (470.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 47 filings (470.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 33 filings (330.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 79 filings (790.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 47 filings (470.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 39 filings (390.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 50 filings (500.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 30 filings (300.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 57 filings (570.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 40 filings (400.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 42 filings (420.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 49 filings (490.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 59 filings (590.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 58 filings (580.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 53 filings (530.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 38 filings (380.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 54 filings (540.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 41 filings (410.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 42 filings (420.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 30 filings (300.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 45 filings (450.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 39 filings (390.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 42 filings (420.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 42 filings (420.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 47 filings (470.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 66 filings (660.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 38 filings (380.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 31 filings (310.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 45 filings (450.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 58 filings (580.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 33 filings (330.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 39 filings (390.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 30 filings (300.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 52 filings (520.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 65 filings (650.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 48 filings (480.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 50 filings (500.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 56 filings (560.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 31 filings (310.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 44 filings (440.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 49 filings (490.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Oak Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Oak Village

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 8.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Riverdale, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Clayton County average of 6.4 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 34.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 26.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 5,251 eviction filings here over 11 tracked years, with about 47.7% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 72.2% of renter households in 2007.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 13063040522

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13063040522?

Census tract 13063040522 in the Oak Village neighborhood scores 5.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13063040522?

Median gross rent is $1,177/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 62% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13063040522?

31.7% of residents in tract 13063040522 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,992.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13063040522?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 99th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 96th, household 87th, minority 95th, housing 98th.
Q5

Is tract 13063040522 considered part of Oak Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13063040522 fall within Oak Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13063040522?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 5,251 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 13063040522 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 47.66% of renter households, peaking at 72.2% in 2007. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13063040522 struggle to pay rent?

About 34.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 26.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13063040522 compare to Riverdale overall?

Tract 13063040522 scores 5.7/10, higher than the parent city of Riverdale at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Riverdale; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Riverdale

Top eight tracts in Riverdale ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related