Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #19,618 of 84,120 nationally

Glen Haven Eviction Risk: Moderate , Belvedere Park

Tract 13089023215 · DeKalb County, GA · pop 4,233 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

Tract 13089023215 sits in the Glen Haven area of DeKalb County, GA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5.9/10. Severe burden reaches 48%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Risk score
5.9
Moderate
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 15% Stable renters 5% Owners 80%
Tract context
Occupied units1,524
Renter share20.2%
SVI overall0.86
Poverty rate30.0%
Median income$47,766

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Glen Haven
Moderate
Within county
87 th percentile
Rank, 87th percentileLowHigh
#28 of 203 tracts In DeKalb County
High
Within state
95 th percentile
Rank, 95th percentileLowHigh
#146 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Very High
National
77 th percentile
Rank, 77th percentileLowHigh
#19,618 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Belvedere Park and the region

Centroid at 33.7584, -84.2094 · click any tract to drill in

Why Glen Haven scores 5.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Belvedere Park
2.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.4
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
30.0% poverty · this tract
7.5
Supply constraint
$1,644 rent vs county FMR
4.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Belvedere Park
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Belvedere Park
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Belvedere Park
5.0

How Glen Haven compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Glen Haven risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.9This tracttract 0232154.0Belvedere Parkparent city4.5Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 86

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 553Total filings 2020-21
  • 7.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Glen Haven. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Glen Haven

Cost burden runs roughly three in four here against 52.2% across DeKalb County. The dominant input is court filing pressure at 9.7/10. Annualized rent equals 41% of average household income of $47,766, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with.

Food insecurity runs 35.0% against 17.8% nationally. Running hot, regional political climate reads 8.4/10.

The poverty rate is 30%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. Against the DeKalb County average of 4.5, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.4 points. Running cool, state political climate reads 2/10.

Inability to pay a utility bill runs 19.6% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. On the national scale it lands near the 77th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

Only 20% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. Social vulnerability reads 8.7/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 13089023215

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13089023215?

Census tract 13089023215 in the Glen Haven neighborhood scores 5.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13089023215?

Median gross rent is $1,644/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 75% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13089023215?

30.0% of residents in tract 13089023215 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,233.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13089023215?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 86th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 89th, household 63th, minority 96th, housing 69th.
Q5

Is tract 13089023215 considered part of Glen Haven?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13089023215 fall within Glen Haven (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 13089023215 struggle to pay rent?

About 27.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 19.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 13089023215 compare to Belvedere Park overall?

Tract 13089023215 scores 5.9/10, higher than the parent city of Belvedere Park at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Belvedere Park; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related