Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #19,562 of 84,120 nationally

Glen Haven Eviction Risk: Moderate , Belvedere Park

Tract 13089023108 · DeKalb County, GA · pop 4,065 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

Landlord eviction risk in census tract 13089023108 (the Glen Haven area of Belvedere Park, Georgia) comes in at 7.3/10, the Elevated tier. That is riskier than about 98% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 70% of renter households, a severe level, and 44% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,536 a month against an average household income of $36,875 a year, roughly 50% of income at the averages. About 55% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
5.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 39% Stable renters 17% Owners 44%
Tract context
Occupied units1,489
Renter share55.4%
SVI overall0.93
Poverty rate26.4%
Median income$36,875

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Glen Haven
Very High
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 5 tracts In Belvedere Park
Very High
Within county
94 th percentile
Rank, 94th percentileLowHigh
#13 of 203 tracts In DeKalb County
Very High
Within state
85 th percentile
Rank, 85th percentileLowHigh
#421 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Belvedere Park and the region

Centroid at 33.7453, -84.2322 · click any tract to drill in

Why Glen Haven scores 5.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Belvedere Park
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.4
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
26.4% poverty · this tract
6.6
Supply constraint
$1,536 rent vs county FMR
3.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Belvedere Park
8.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Belvedere Park
7.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Belvedere Park
8.1

How Glen Haven compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Glen Haven risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.45.4This tracttract 023108Belvedere Park: 2.82.8Belvedere Parkparent cityCounty: 3.53.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 93

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 3,454Total filings over 8 yrs
  • 48.70%Avg annual filing rate
  • 80.3%Peak (2007)
  • 408Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 130890231082004: 423 filings (58.10/100 renter HHs)2007: 617 filings (80.34/100 renter HHs)2011: 356 filings (38.32/100 renter HHs)2012: 404 filings (43.49/100 renter HHs)2013: 351 filings (37.78/100 renter HHs)2014: 442 filings (47.58/100 renter HHs)2015: 453 filings (48.76/100 renter HHs)2016: 408 filings (35.23/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 8 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 1,999Total filings 2020-21
  • 26.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 31 filings (310.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 32 filings (320.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 28 filings (280.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 33 filings (330.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 68 filings (680.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 31 filings (310.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 28 filings (280.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 43 filings (430.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 99 filings (990.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 31 filings (310.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 60 filings (600.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 36 filings (360.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 49 filings (490.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 48 filings (480.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 31 filings (310.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 33 filings (330.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 48 filings (480.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 60 filings (600.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 28 filings (280.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 36 filings (360.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 27 filings (270.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 32 filings (320.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 24 filings (240.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 66 filings (660.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 30 filings (300.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 31 filings (310.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 32 filings (320.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 33 filings (330.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 32 filings (320.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 48 filings (480.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 34 filings (340.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 31 filings (310.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 43 filings (430.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 24 filings (240.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 33 filings (330.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 32 filings (320.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 30 filings (300.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Glen Haven. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Glen Haven

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 8.8/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Belvedere Park, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the DeKalb County average of 6.4 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 3,454 eviction filings here over 8 tracked years, with about 48.7% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 80.3% of renter households in 2007.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 93rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 13089023108

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13089023108?

Census tract 13089023108 in the Glen Haven neighborhood scores 5.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13089023108?

Median gross rent is $1,536/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 70% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13089023108?

26.4% of residents in tract 13089023108 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,065.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13089023108?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 93th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 93th, household 96th, minority 93th, housing 62th.
Q5

Is tract 13089023108 considered part of Glen Haven?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13089023108 fall within Glen Haven (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13089023108?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 3,454 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 13089023108 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 48.70% of renter households, peaking at 80.3% in 2007. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13089023108 struggle to pay rent?

About 28.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 22.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13089023108 compare to Belvedere Park overall?

Tract 13089023108 scores 5.4/10, higher than the parent city of Belvedere Park at 2.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Belvedere Park; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Belvedere Park

Top eight tracts in Belvedere Park ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related