Neighborhood · Ranked #51,553 of 84,120 nationally
Beaver Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Lilburn
Tract 13135050454 ·
Gwinnett County, GA · pop 3,638 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi
Here is how census tract 13135050454, in the Beaver Hills neighborhood of Lilburn, looks to a landlord: a 5.7/10 eviction-risk score (Moderate tier) across a population of 3,638. That is riskier than about 65% of US census tracts.
About 72% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 19% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,766 a month while the average household earns $61,689 a year, roughly 34% of income at the averages. About 62% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.
Risk score
3.4
Lower
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 45%Stable renters 17%Owners 38%
Tract context
Occupied units1,308
Renter share62.0%
SVI overall0.68
Poverty rate13.2%
Median income$61,689
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0th percentile
#3 of 3 tracts In Beaver Hills
Very Low
Within county
74th percentile
#58 of 220 tracts In Gwinnett County
Elevated
Within state
45th percentile
#1,525 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Moderate
National
39th percentile
#51,553 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Lilburn and the region
Centroid at 33.9107, -84.1460 · click any tract to drill in
Why Beaver Hills scores 3.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Lilburn
2.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
13.2% poverty · this tract
3.3
Supply constraint
$1,766 rent vs county FMR
4.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lilburn
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lilburn
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lilburn
5.0
How Beaver Hills compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 68
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
95%Socioeconomic
6%Household composition
91%Racial/ethnic minority
47%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
1,428Total filings 2020-21
18.8Avg monthly (observed)
0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Beaver Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
21.3%Housing insecurity
11.0%Utility-shutoff threat
24.3%Food insecurity
15.5%SNAP enrollment
11.8%Transit barriers
26.0%No health insurance
17.2%Frequent mental distress
28.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Beaver Hills
What moves this score most is eviction process difficulty at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Lilburn, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Gwinnett County average of 5.8 and in line with the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is racially mixed and ranks around the 68th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
In CDC survey modeling, about 21.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 11.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 13135050454
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13135050454?
Census tract 13135050454 in the Beaver Hills neighborhood scores 3.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 13135050454?
Median gross rent is $1,766/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 72% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 13135050454?
13.2% of residents in tract 13135050454 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,638.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 13135050454?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 68th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 95th, household 6th, minority 91th, housing 47th.
Q5
Is tract 13135050454 considered part of Beaver Hills?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13135050454 fall within Beaver Hills (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 13135050454 struggle to pay rent?
About 21.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 13135050454 compare to Lilburn overall?
Tract 13135050454 scores 3.4/10, higher than the parent city of Lilburn at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lilburn; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.