Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #37,882 of 84,120 nationally

East Highlands Eviction Risk: Moderate , Columbus

Tract 13215001800 · Muscogee County, GA · pop 1,264 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

Census tract 13215001800 covers part of the East Highlands area of Columbus, GA, and scores 4.7/10 on landlord eviction risk. The main counterweight is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.

Risk score
4.7
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 24% Stable renters 48% Owners 28%
Tract context
Occupied units670
Renter share71.9%
SVI overall0.71
Poverty rate27.1%
Median income$51,324

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In East Highlands
Very High
Within parent city
60 th percentile
Rank, 60th percentileLowHigh
#24 of 59 tracts In Columbus
Elevated
Within county
62 th percentile
Rank, 62nd percentileLowHigh
#23 of 59 tracts In Muscogee County
Elevated
Within state
68 th percentile
Rank, 68th percentileLowHigh
#889 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Columbus and the region

Centroid at 32.4769, -84.9758 · click any tract to drill in

Why East Highlands scores 4.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Columbus
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.2
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
27.1% poverty · this tract
6.8
Supply constraint
$699 rent vs county FMR
1.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Columbus
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Columbus
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Columbus
3.0

How East Highlands compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
East Highlands risk score vs. parent city / county / state4.7This tracttract 0018003.6Columbusparent city4.1Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 71

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within East Highlands. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in East Highlands

At $699 a month, rents run 37% under what the rest of Columbus commands. 24% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Cost burden runs roughly one in three here against 44.6% across Muscogee County. Running cool, supply constraint reads 1.3/10. This is renter territory: 72% of occupied units are tenant-occupied.

The poverty rate is 27%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. On the softer side, state political climate reads 2/10. SNAP participation runs 24.2% against 15.2% nationally.

Against the Muscogee County average of 4.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 0.6 points. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 14.9% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.

This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Columbus. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. That is riskier than roughly 55% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 13215001800

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13215001800?

Census tract 13215001800 in the East Highlands neighborhood scores 4.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13215001800?

Median gross rent is $699/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 33% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13215001800?

27.1% of residents in tract 13215001800 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,264.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13215001800?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 71th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 98th, household 8th, minority 64th, housing 51th.
Q5

Is tract 13215001800 considered part of East Highlands?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13215001800 fall within East Highlands (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 13215001800 struggle to pay rent?

About 21.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 13215001800 compare to Columbus overall?

Tract 13215001800 scores 4.7/10, higher than the parent city of Columbus at 3.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Columbus eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 13215001800 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 82% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Columbus

Top eight tracts in Columbus ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related