Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #20,506 of 84,120 nationally
Mid-North District Eviction Risk: Moderate , Chicago
Tract 17031071300 · Cook County, IL · pop 4,129 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
Census tract 17031071300 covers part of the Mid-North District area of Chicago, IL, and scores 5.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. Cost burden runs 22% here against 45.6% across Cook County.
Risk score
5.8
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10%
Stable renters 35%
Owners 55%
Tract context
Occupied units2,113
Renter share44.4%
SVI overall0.20
Poverty rate14.6%
Median income$127,083
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
23
th percentile
Low
Within county
42
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
70
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Chicago and the region
Centroid at 41.9218, -87.6415 · click any tract to drill in
Why Mid-North District scores 5.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Chicago
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
14.6% poverty · this tract
3.7
Supply constraint
$1,934 rent vs county FMR
6.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chicago
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chicago
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chicago
6.5
How Mid-North District compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 20
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 17%Socioeconomic
- 3%Household composition
- 40%Racial/ethnic minority
- 72%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 6%Grade C
- 94%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 169Total filings over 15 yrs
- 1.09%Avg annual filing rate
- 2.4%Peak (2010)
- 10Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 17% over the past 15 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Mid-North District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.9%Housing insecurity
- 4.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 6.9%Food insecurity
- 5.1%SNAP enrollment
- 4.7%Transit barriers
- 4.5%No health insurance
- 14.1%Frequent mental distress
- 16.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Mid-North District
At $1,934 a month, rents run 34% over what the rest of Chicago commands. The score leans hardest on local political climate at 8.5/10.
Disability prevalence runs 16.5% against 31.5% nationally. Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 8/10.
The severe-burden share is 13%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. On the high side, regional political climate reads 7.5/10. The filing record is not thin: 169 evictions over 15 years of observation.
Inability to pay a utility bill runs 4.1% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. The worst year on record was 2010, when 2.4% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
In a typical year about 1.1% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 76th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2.8/10.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 17031071300
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031071300?
Census tract 17031071300 in the Mid-North District neighborhood scores 5.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 17031071300?
Median gross rent is $1,934/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 22% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031071300?
14.6% of residents in tract 17031071300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,129.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031071300?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 20th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 17th, household 3th, minority 40th, housing 72th.
Q5
Is tract 17031071300 considered part of Mid-North District?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17031071300 fall within Mid-North District (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031071300?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 169 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 17031071300 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.09% of renter households, peaking at 2.4% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 17031071300 struggle to pay rent?
About 6.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 17031071300 compare to Chicago overall?
Tract 17031071300 scores 5.8/10, lower than the parent city of Chicago at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chicago eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 17031071300 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 94% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Chicago
Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · IL
Mayfair
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Homan Square
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Park Manor
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Rosemoor
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
South Brighton
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Becks Park
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Homan Square
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Crawford
8.1
/ 10 · High
Related