Tract 17031611500 ·
Cook County, IL · pop 3,273 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi
With a score of 8.1/10, tract 17031611500 in the South Brighton area of Chicago, IL reads high for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,273. 35% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Risk score
8.1
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 27%Stable renters 35%Owners 38%
Tract context
Occupied units1,036
Renter share62.1%
SVI overall0.99
Poverty rate21.5%
Median income$42,353
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#6 of 11 tracts In South Brighton
Moderate
Within parent city
74th percentile
#207 of 792 tracts In Chicago
Elevated
Within county
87th percentile
#168 of 1,331 tracts In Cook County
High
Within state
100th percentile
#5 of 3,263 tracts In Illinois
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Chicago and the region
Centroid at 41.8054, -87.6787 · click any tract to drill in
Why South Brighton scores 8.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Chicago
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
21.5% poverty · this tract
5.4
Supply constraint
$972 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chicago
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chicago
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chicago
6.5
How South Brighton compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 99
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
99%Socioeconomic
97%Household composition
95%Racial/ethnic minority
92%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
0%Grade A
0%Grade B
0%Grade C
85%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
184Total filings over 15 yrs
2.18%Avg annual filing rate
4.1%Peak (2012)
12Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year2001 to 2015
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 15 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within South Brighton. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
35.2%Housing insecurity
20.1%Utility-shutoff threat
48.7%Food insecurity
43.7%SNAP enrollment
21.3%Transit barriers
37.0%No health insurance
18.1%Frequent mental distress
43.1%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in South Brighton
Food insecurity runs 48.7% against 17.8% nationally. The main counterweight is supply constraint at 1/10. Average gross rent is $972, 33% below the Chicago average.
It sits 2.0 points above the Cook County average of 6.1. On the high side, local political climate reads 8.5/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 8/10.
The poverty rate is 22%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 20.1% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 184 filings here across 15 tracked years.
Filings peaked in 2012 at 4.1% of renter households. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
In a typical year about 2.2% of renter households face a filing.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 17031611500
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031611500?
Census tract 17031611500 in the South Brighton neighborhood scores 8.1/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 17031611500?
Median gross rent is $972/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 44% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031611500?
21.5% of residents in tract 17031611500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,273.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031611500?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 99th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 99th, household 97th, minority 95th, housing 92th.
Q5
Is tract 17031611500 considered part of South Brighton?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17031611500 fall within South Brighton (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031611500?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 184 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 17031611500 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.18% of renter households, peaking at 4.1% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 17031611500 struggle to pay rent?
About 35.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 20.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 17031611500 compare to Chicago overall?
Tract 17031611500 scores 8.1/10, higher than the parent city of Chicago at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chicago eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 17031611500 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 85% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Chicago
Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.