Mount Greenwood Eviction Risk: Moderate , Chicago
Tract 17031750300 · Cook County, IL · pop 2,546 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi
Tract 17031750300 sits in the Mount Greenwood area of Chicago eviction risk, IL, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5.3/10. The main counterweight is economic stress at 1/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Chicago and the region
Centroid at 41.6954, -87.6862 · click any tract to drill in
Why Mount Greenwood scores 5.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Mount Greenwood compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 6
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 1%Socioeconomic
- 49%Household composition
- 24%Racial/ethnic minority
- 10%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 1%Grade B
- 99%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 110Total filings over 15 yrs
- 4.36%Avg annual filing rate
- 6.8%Peak (2011)
- 10Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Mount Greenwood. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.9%Housing insecurity
- 4.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 8.0%Food insecurity
- 6.3%SNAP enrollment
- 4.7%Transit barriers
- 5.0%No health insurance
- 13.6%Frequent mental distress
- 19.7%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Mount Greenwood
On the high side, local political climate reads 8.5/10. Against Cook County at 45.6%, 36% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 8/10. Food insecurity runs 8.0% against 17.8% nationally.
SNAP participation runs 6.3% against 15.2% nationally. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 110 filings here across 15 tracked years. It sits 0.8 points below the Cook County average of 6.1.
The worst year on record was 2011, when 6.8% of renter households were served. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Chicago. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
In a typical year about 4.4% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 67% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.5/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Rent consumes only 14% of average household income of $120,643, an unusually wide affordability cushion.
Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 4%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 17031750300
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031750300?
What is the average rent in tract 17031750300?
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031750300?
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031750300?
Is tract 17031750300 considered part of Mount Greenwood?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031750300?
What share of households in tract 17031750300 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 17031750300 compare to Chicago overall?
Was tract 17031750300 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Chicago
Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.