Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #28,095 of 84,120 nationally

Mount Greenwood Eviction Risk: Moderate , Chicago

Tract 17031750300 · Cook County, IL · pop 2,546 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

Tract 17031750300 sits in the Mount Greenwood area of Chicago eviction risk, IL, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5.3/10. The main counterweight is economic stress at 1/10.

Risk score
5.3
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11% Stable renters 19% Owners 70%
Tract context
Occupied units988
Renter share29.9%
SVI overall0.06
Poverty rate4.0%
Median income$120,643

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 8 tracts In Mount Greenwood
Low
Within parent city
9 th percentile
Rank, 9th percentileLowHigh
#718 of 792 tracts In Chicago
Very Low
Within county
27 th percentile
Rank, 27th percentileLowHigh
#979 of 1,331 tracts In Cook County
Low
Within state
59 th percentile
Rank, 59th percentileLowHigh
#1,346 of 3,263 tracts In Illinois
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Chicago and the region

Centroid at 41.6954, -87.6862 · click any tract to drill in

Why Mount Greenwood scores 5.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Chicago
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
4.0% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,430 rent vs county FMR
3.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chicago
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chicago
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chicago
6.5

How Mount Greenwood compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Mount Greenwood risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.35.3This tracttract 750300Chicago: 6.76.7Chicagoparent cityCounty: 6.16.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.15.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 6

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 110Total filings over 15 yrs
  • 4.36%Avg annual filing rate
  • 6.8%Peak (2011)
  • 10Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 170317503002001: 4 filings (2.04/100 renter HHs)2002: 4 filings (2.04/100 renter HHs)2003: 7 filings (3.57/100 renter HHs)2004: 5 filings (2.55/100 renter HHs)2005: 3 filings (2.24/100 renter HHs)2006: 1 filings (0.75/100 renter HHs)2007: 4 filings (2.99/100 renter HHs)2008: 9 filings (6.72/100 renter HHs)2009: 9 filings (6.72/100 renter HHs)2010: 9 filings (4.48/100 renter HHs)2011: 12 filings (6.82/100 renter HHs)2012: 11 filings (6.25/100 renter HHs)2013: 12 filings (6.82/100 renter HHs)2014: 10 filings (5.68/100 renter HHs)2015: 10 filings (5.68/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 150% over the past 15 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Mount Greenwood. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Mount Greenwood

On the high side, local political climate reads 8.5/10. Against Cook County at 45.6%, 36% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 8/10. Food insecurity runs 8.0% against 17.8% nationally.

SNAP participation runs 6.3% against 15.2% nationally. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 110 filings here across 15 tracked years. It sits 0.8 points below the Cook County average of 6.1.

The worst year on record was 2011, when 6.8% of renter households were served. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Chicago. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

In a typical year about 4.4% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 67% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.5/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Rent consumes only 14% of average household income of $120,643, an unusually wide affordability cushion.

Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 4%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 17031750300

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031750300?

Census tract 17031750300 in the Mount Greenwood neighborhood scores 5.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 17031750300?

Median gross rent is $1,430/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 36% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 17031750300?

4.0% of residents in tract 17031750300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,546.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 17031750300?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 6th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 1th, household 49th, minority 24th, housing 10th.
Q5

Is tract 17031750300 considered part of Mount Greenwood?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17031750300 fall within Mount Greenwood (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031750300?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 110 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 17031750300 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.36% of renter households, peaking at 6.8% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 17031750300 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 17031750300 compare to Chicago overall?

Tract 17031750300 scores 5.3/10, lower than the parent city of Chicago at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chicago eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 17031750300 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Chicago

Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related