Neighborhood · Ranked #75,086 of 84,120 nationally
Fairfax Village Eviction Risk: Lower , Rolling Meadows
Tract 17031803902 ·
Cook County, IL · pop 3,498 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
Landlord eviction risk in census tract 17031803902 (the Fairfax Village neighborhood of Rolling Meadows, Illinois) comes in at 4.7/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than roughly 29% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
27% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a moderate level, and 7% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,063 a month against an average household income of $107,533 a year, roughly 23% of income at the averages. About 13% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
1.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3%Stable renters 9%Owners 88%
Tract context
Occupied units1,229
Renter share12.5%
SVI overall0.35
Poverty rate2.9%
Median income$107,533
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Fairfax Village
Moderate
Within parent city
50th percentile
#3 of 5 tracts In Rolling Meadows
Moderate
Within county
10th percentile
#1,195 of 1,331 tracts In Cook County
Very Low
Within state
19th percentile
#2,650 of 3,263 tracts In Illinois
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Rolling Meadows and the region
Centroid at 42.0830, -88.0152 · click any tract to drill in
Why Fairfax Village scores 1.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Rolling Meadows
6.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
2.9% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,063 rent vs county FMR
6.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Rolling Meadows
4.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Rolling Meadows
5.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Rolling Meadows
4.2
How Fairfax Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 35
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
50%Socioeconomic
30%Household composition
46%Racial/ethnic minority
24%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
59Total filings over 14 yrs
2.93%Avg annual filing rate
7.3%Peak (2005)
2Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year2001 to 2015
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 15 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
11.2%Housing insecurity
6.0%Utility-shutoff threat
13.0%Food insecurity
9.9%SNAP enrollment
6.5%Transit barriers
9.5%No health insurance
14.9%Frequent mental distress
25.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Fairfax Village
What moves this score most is supply constraint at 6.7/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Rolling Meadows, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Cook County average of 5.7 and below the Illinois statewide average of 5.4. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 35th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 59 eviction filings here over 14 tracked years, with about 2.9% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 7.3% of renter households in 2005.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 17031803902
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031803902?
Census tract 17031803902 in the Fairfax Village neighborhood scores 1.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 17031803902?
Median gross rent is $2,063/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 27% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031803902?
2.9% of residents in tract 17031803902 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,498.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031803902?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 35th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 50th, household 30th, minority 46th, housing 24th.
Q5
Is tract 17031803902 considered part of Fairfax Village?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17031803902 fall within Fairfax Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031803902?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 59 eviction filings across 14 validated years in tract 17031803902 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.93% of renter households, peaking at 7.3% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 17031803902 struggle to pay rent?
About 11.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 17031803902 compare to Rolling Meadows overall?
Tract 17031803902 scores 1.9/10, lower than the parent city of Rolling Meadows at 4.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rolling Meadows; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Rolling Meadows
Top eight tracts in Rolling Meadows ranked by composite eviction-risk score.