Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #12,481 of 84,120 nationally

K-Town Historic District Eviction Risk: Elevated , Chicago

Tract 17031813801 · Cook County, IL · pop 3,282 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

Tract 17031813801 sits in the K-Town Historic District area of Cicero eviction risk, IL, carrying an eviction-risk score of 7.1/10. Population here is 3,282. The clearest offset is supply constraint at 1.1/10.

Risk score
7.1
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 29% Stable renters 34% Owners 37%
Tract context
Occupied units1,013
Renter share62.5%
SVI overall0.82
Poverty rate16.2%
Median income$57,303

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#5 of 7 tracts In K-Town Historic District
Low
Within parent city
73 th percentile
Rank, 73rd percentileLowHigh
#5 of 16 tracts In Chicago
Elevated
Within county
63 th percentile
Rank, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#492 of 1,331 tracts In Cook County
Elevated
Within state
83 th percentile
Rank, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#543 of 3,263 tracts In Illinois
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Chicago and the region

Centroid at 41.8503, -87.7435 · click any tract to drill in

Why K-Town Historic District scores 7.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Chicago
7.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
16.2% poverty · this tract
4.1
Supply constraint
$1,073 rent vs county FMR
1.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chicago
5.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chicago
8.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chicago
5.8

How K-Town Historic District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
K-Town Historic District risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 7.17.1This tracttract 813801Chicago: 6.76.7Chicagoparent cityCounty: 6.16.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.15.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 82

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 182Total filings over 15 yrs
  • 2.51%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.4%Peak (2010)
  • 15Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 170318138012001: 10 filings (1.53/100 renter HHs)2002: 12 filings (1.84/100 renter HHs)2003: 12 filings (1.84/100 renter HHs)2004: 11 filings (1.69/100 renter HHs)2005: 11 filings (2.37/100 renter HHs)2006: 10 filings (2.16/100 renter HHs)2007: 6 filings (1.29/100 renter HHs)2008: 12 filings (2.59/100 renter HHs)2009: 11 filings (2.37/100 renter HHs)2010: 22 filings (5.39/100 renter HHs)2011: 15 filings (3.36/100 renter HHs)2012: 15 filings (3.36/100 renter HHs)2013: 10 filings (2.24/100 renter HHs)2014: 10 filings (2.24/100 renter HHs)2015: 15 filings (3.36/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 50% over the past 15 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within K-Town Historic District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in K-Town Historic District

Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.8/10. Housing insecurity runs 31.8% against 14.2% nationally.

SNAP participation runs 32.1% against 15.2% nationally. On the high side, local political climate reads 7.8/10. The severe-burden share is 12%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Against the Cook County average of 6.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.0 points. Court records carry 182 eviction filings across 15 observed years. The worst year on record was 2010, when 5.4% of renter households were served.

This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Chicago. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 2.5% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 85% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 8.4/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the IL average is 5.1, so this tract runs 2.0 points hotter.

Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 17031813801

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031813801?

Census tract 17031813801 in the K-Town Historic District neighborhood scores 7.1/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 17031813801?

Median gross rent is $1,073/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 17031813801?

16.2% of residents in tract 17031813801 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,282.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 17031813801?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 82th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 88th, household 75th, minority 98th, housing 47th.
Q5

Is tract 17031813801 considered part of K-Town Historic District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17031813801 fall within K-Town Historic District (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031813801?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 182 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 17031813801 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.51% of renter households, peaking at 5.4% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 17031813801 struggle to pay rent?

About 31.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 16.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 17031813801 compare to Chicago overall?

Tract 17031813801 scores 7.1/10, higher than the parent city of Chicago at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chicago eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 17031813801 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 21% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Chicago

Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related