Ranch Triangle Eviction Risk: Moderate , Chicago
Tract 17031832600 · Cook County, IL · pop 4,348 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi
With a score of 5.3/10, tract 17031832600 in the Ranch Triangle area of Chicago, IL reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,348. Cost burden runs 22% here against 45.6% across Cook County.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Chicago and the region
Centroid at 41.9148, -87.6545 · click any tract to drill in
Why Ranch Triangle scores 5.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Ranch Triangle compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 10
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 15%Socioeconomic
- 1%Household composition
- 22%Racial/ethnic minority
- 56%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 58%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 95Total filings over 15 yrs
- 0.78%Avg annual filing rate
- 1.4%Peak (2001)
- 5Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Ranch Triangle. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.9%Housing insecurity
- 4.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 6.7%Food insecurity
- 4.9%SNAP enrollment
- 4.6%Transit barriers
- 4.6%No health insurance
- 14.5%Frequent mental distress
- 15.5%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Ranch Triangle
At $2,397 a month, rents run 66% over what the rest of Chicago commands. The voucher gap is 36.1%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.
The clearest offset is economic stress at 1/10. On the high side, supply constraint reads 8.6/10. Disability prevalence runs 15.5% against 31.5% nationally.
Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 8.5/10. The severe-burden share is 10%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
The filing record is not thin: 95 evictions over 15 years of observation. It sits 0.8 points below the Cook County average of 6.1. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 4.0% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.
Filings peaked in 2001 at 1.4% of renter households. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 17031832600
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031832600?
What is the average rent in tract 17031832600?
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031832600?
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031832600?
Is tract 17031832600 considered part of Ranch Triangle?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031832600?
What share of households in tract 17031832600 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 17031832600 compare to Chicago overall?
Was tract 17031832600 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Chicago
Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.