Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #37,643 of 84,120 nationally

Chatham-Arch Eviction Risk: Moderate , Indianapolis

Tract 18097354202 · Marion County, IN · pop 3,424 · neighborhood within 0.0 mi

How risky is Chatham-Arch in Indianapolis city (balance) for landlords? Census tract 18097354202 scores 5.3/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than about 50% of US census tracts.

32% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 19% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,523 monthly, set against $70,234 in average yearly household income, roughly 26% of income at the averages. Renters make up 74% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
4.2
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 24% Stable renters 51% Owners 25%
Tract context
Occupied units2,423
Renter share74.3%
SVI overall0.27
Poverty rate17.4%
Median income$70,234

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Chatham-Arch
Moderate
Within parent city
54 th percentile
Rank, 54th percentileLowHigh
#108 of 231 tracts In Indianapolis
Moderate
Within county
56 th percentile
Rank, 56th percentileLowHigh
#113 of 253 tracts In Marion County
Elevated
Within state
69 th percentile
Rank, 69th percentileLowHigh
#518 of 1,693 tracts In Indiana
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Indianapolis and the region

Centroid at 39.7792, -86.1472 · click any tract to drill in

Why Chatham-Arch scores 4.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Indianapolis
6.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.5
State political climate
Indiana legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
17.4% poverty · this tract
4.3
Supply constraint
$1,523 rent vs county FMR
6.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Indianapolis
6.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Indianapolis
8.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Indianapolis
6.8

How Chatham-Arch compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Chatham-Arch risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.24.2This tracttract 354202Indianapolis: 2.72.7Indianapolisparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.63.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 27

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 359Total filings 2020-21
  • 4.7Avg monthly (observed)
  • 4.6Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.02×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 8 filings (1.39× baseline)2020-02-01: 4 filings (0.67× baseline)2020-03-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 3 filings (0.46× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2020-10-01: 4 filings (1.14× baseline)2020-11-01: 3 filings (0.46× baseline)2020-12-01: 5 filings (1.18× baseline)2021-01-01: 3 filings (0.52× baseline)2021-02-01: 2 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-03-01: 7 filings (1.87× baseline)2021-04-01: 4 filings (0.89× baseline)2021-05-01: 3 filings (0.57× baseline)2021-06-01: 5 filings (0.95× baseline)2021-07-01: 4 filings (0.94× baseline)2021-08-01: 2 filings (0.31× baseline)2021-09-01: 3 filings (0.92× baseline)2021-10-01: 3 filings (0.86× baseline)2021-11-01: 7 filings (1.08× baseline)2021-12-01: 8 filings (1.88× baseline)2022-01-01: 8 filings (1.39× baseline)2022-02-01: 7 filings (1.17× baseline)2022-03-01: 7 filings (1.87× baseline)2022-04-01: 10 filings (2.22× baseline)2022-05-01: 7 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-06-01: 9 filings (1.71× baseline)2022-07-01: 4 filings (0.94× baseline)2022-08-01: 8 filings (1.23× baseline)2022-09-01: 14 filings (4.31× baseline)2022-10-01: 6 filings (1.71× baseline)2022-11-01: 3 filings (0.46× baseline)2022-12-01: 6 filings (1.41× baseline)2023-01-01: 8 filings (1.39× baseline)2023-02-01: 9 filings (1.50× baseline)2023-03-01: 3 filings (0.80× baseline)2023-04-01: 4 filings (0.89× baseline)2023-05-01: 2 filings (0.38× baseline)2023-06-01: 14 filings (2.67× baseline)2023-07-01: 4 filings (0.94× baseline)2023-08-01: 9 filings (1.38× baseline)2023-09-01: 6 filings (1.85× baseline)2023-10-01: 4 filings (1.14× baseline)2023-11-01: 6 filings (0.92× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 7 filings (1.22× baseline)2024-02-01: 2 filings (0.33× baseline)2024-03-01: 4 filings (1.07× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 5 filings (0.95× baseline)2024-06-01: 5 filings (0.95× baseline)2024-07-01: 2 filings (0.47× baseline)2024-08-01: 6 filings (0.92× baseline)2024-09-01: 7 filings (2.15× baseline)2024-10-01: 5 filings (1.43× baseline)2024-11-01: 4 filings (0.62× baseline)2024-12-01: 2 filings (0.47× baseline)2025-01-01: 2 filings (0.35× baseline)2025-02-01: 4 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-03-01: 4 filings (1.07× baseline)2025-04-01: 9 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 1 filings (0.19× baseline)2025-06-01: 3 filings (0.57× baseline)2025-07-01: 2 filings (0.47× baseline)2025-08-01: 3 filings (0.46× baseline)2025-09-01: 5 filings (1.54× baseline)2025-10-01: 4 filings (1.14× baseline)2025-11-01: 2 filings (0.31× baseline)2025-12-01: 4 filings (0.94× baseline)2026-01-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Indianapolis, IN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Chatham-Arch

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 8.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Indianapolis eviction risk city (balance), while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Marion County average of 5.4 and above the Indiana statewide average of 4.7. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 1.02x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, roughly back to the pre-pandemic baseline.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 27th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 18097354202

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 18097354202?

Census tract 18097354202 in the Chatham-Arch neighborhood scores 4.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 18097354202?

Median gross rent is $1,523/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 32% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 18097354202?

17.4% of residents in tract 18097354202 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,424.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 18097354202?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 27th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 49th, household 5th, minority 48th, housing 31th.
Q5

Is tract 18097354202 considered part of Chatham-Arch?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 18097354202 fall within Chatham-Arch (neighborhood centroid within 0.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 18097354202 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.02× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Indianapolis eviction risk, IN), 2020-2021.
Q7

What share of households in tract 18097354202 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 18097354202 compare to Indianapolis overall?

Tract 18097354202 scores 4.2/10, higher than the parent city of Indianapolis at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Indianapolis eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 18097354202 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 72% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Indianapolis

Top eight tracts in Indianapolis ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related