Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #79,998 of 84,120 nationally

Friendly Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Fort Washington

Tract 24033801305 · Prince George's County, MD · pop 6,257 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

The Elevated-tier score of 6.9/10 for census tract 24033801305 reflects conditions in the Friendly Hills neighborhood of Fort Washington, Maryland. That is riskier than roughly 93% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

40% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 6% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $2,520 monthly, set against $157,162 in average yearly household income, roughly 19% of income at the averages. About 11% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.4
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4% Stable renters 7% Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units2,072
Renter share11.0%
SVI overall0.39
Poverty rate6.9%
Median income$157,162

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Friendly Hills
Very Low
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Fort Washington
Very Low
Within county
16 th percentile
Rank, 16th percentileLowHigh
#181 of 214 tracts In Prince George's County
Very Low
Within state
16 th percentile
Rank, 16th percentileLowHigh
#1,231 of 1,464 tracts In Maryland
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Fort Washington and the region

Centroid at 38.7643, -76.9718 · click any tract to drill in

Why Friendly Hills scores 1.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Fort Washington
9.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
9.0
State political climate
Maryland legislature & governorship
5.7
Economic stress
6.9% poverty · this tract
1.7
Supply constraint
$2,520 rent vs county FMR
5.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fort Washington
8.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fort Washington
2.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fort Washington
5.7

How Friendly Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Friendly Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.41.4This tracttract 801305Fort Washington: 6.46.4Fort Washingtonparent cityCounty: 3.53.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.63.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 39

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 69Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 11.90%Avg annual filing rate
  • 14.5%Peak (2014)
  • 15Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2011 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 240338013052011: 9 filings (5.66/100 renter HHs)2012: 22 filings (13.84/100 renter HHs)2014: 23 filings (14.47/100 renter HHs)2016: 15 filings (13.64/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 67% over the past 4 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Friendly Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Friendly Hills

The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 8.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Fort Washington eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Prince George's County average of 6.9 and above the Maryland statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 39th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 69 eviction filings here over 4 tracked years, with about 11.9% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 14.5% of renter households in 2014.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 24033801305

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 24033801305?

Census tract 24033801305 in the Friendly Hills neighborhood scores 1.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 24033801305?

Median gross rent is $2,520/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 40% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 24033801305?

6.9% of residents in tract 24033801305 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,257.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 24033801305?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 39th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 44th, household 52th, minority 93th, housing 13th.
Q5

Is tract 24033801305 considered part of Friendly Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 24033801305 fall within Friendly Hills (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 24033801305?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 69 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 24033801305 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 11.90% of renter households, peaking at 14.5% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 24033801305 struggle to pay rent?

About 18.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 24033801305 compare to Fort Washington overall?

Tract 24033801305 scores 1.4/10, lower than the parent city of Fort Washington at 6.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fort Washington eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Fort Washington

Top eight tracts in Fort Washington ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related