Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #61,558 of 84,120 nationally

Friendly Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Fort Washington

Tract 24033801305 · Prince George's County, MD · pop 6,257 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

With a score of 3.3/10, tract 24033801305 in the Friendly Hills area of Friendly, MD reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 6,257. What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 10/10.

Risk score
3.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4% Stable renters 7% Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units2,072
Renter share11.0%
SVI overall0.39
Poverty rate6.9%
Median income$157,162

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Friendly Hills
Very Low
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Fort Washington
Very Low
Within county
24 th percentile
Rank, 24th percentileLowHigh
#163 of 214 tracts In Prince George's County
Low
Within state
11 th percentile
Rank, 11th percentileLowHigh
#1,304 of 1,464 tracts In Maryland
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Fort Washington and the region

Centroid at 38.7643, -76.9718 · click any tract to drill in

Why Friendly Hills scores 3.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Fort Washington
9.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
9.0
State political climate
Maryland legislature & governorship
5.7
Economic stress
6.9% poverty · this tract
1.7
Supply constraint
$2,520 rent vs county FMR
5.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fort Washington
8.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fort Washington
2.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fort Washington
5.7

How Friendly Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Friendly Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.3This tracttract 8013054.6Fort Washingtonparent city4.9Countyavg tract in county5.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 39

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 69Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 11.90%Avg annual filing rate
  • 14.5%Peak (2014)
  • 15Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2011 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 24033801305
Filings climbed 67% over the past 4 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Friendly Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Friendly Hills

On the high side, local political climate reads 9.1/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, regional political climate reads 9/10. Against the Prince George's County average of 4.9, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.6 points.

Against Prince George's County at 45.6%, 40% of renters here are cost-burdened. Court records carry 69 eviction filings across 4 observed years.

At $2,520 a month, rents run 9% over what the rest of Friendly commands. The worst year on record was 2014, when 14.5% of renter households were served.

In a typical year about 11.9% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #61,558 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Only 11% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 4.5/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the MD average is 5.5, so this tract runs 2.2 points cooler.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 24033801305

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 24033801305?

Census tract 24033801305 in the Friendly Hills neighborhood scores 3.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 24033801305?

Median gross rent is $2,520/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 40% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 24033801305?

6.9% of residents in tract 24033801305 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,257.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 24033801305?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 39th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 44th, household 52th, minority 93th, housing 13th.
Q5

Is tract 24033801305 considered part of Friendly Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 24033801305 fall within Friendly Hills (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 24033801305?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 69 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 24033801305 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 11.90% of renter households, peaking at 14.5% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 24033801305 struggle to pay rent?

About 18.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 24033801305 compare to Fort Washington overall?

Tract 24033801305 scores 3.3/10, lower than the parent city of Fort Washington at 4.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fort Washington eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Fort Washington

Top eight tracts in Fort Washington ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related