Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #79,124 of 84,120 nationally

Friendly Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Fort Washington

Tract 24033801313 · Prince George's County, MD · pop 3,319 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

Census tract 24033801313 runs through Friendly Hills in Fort Washington. With 3,319 residents, it scores 6.9/10 for landlords. On the national scale it ranks #5,669 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

96% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 38% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,096 a month against an average household income of $117,381 a year, roughly 21% of income at the averages. Renters make up 13% of occupied homes.

Risk score
1.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13% Stable renters 1% Owners 86%
Tract context
Occupied units1,084
Renter share13.2%
SVI overall0.52
Poverty rate0.8%
Median income$117,381

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Friendly Hills
Very High
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 7 tracts In Fort Washington
Very High
Within county
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#172 of 214 tracts In Prince George's County
Very Low
Within state
19 th percentile
Rank, 19th percentileLowHigh
#1,188 of 1,464 tracts In Maryland
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Fort Washington and the region

Centroid at 38.7459, -76.9832 · click any tract to drill in

Why Friendly Hills scores 1.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Fort Washington
9.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
9.0
State political climate
Maryland legislature & governorship
5.7
Economic stress
0.8% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,096 rent vs county FMR
4.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fort Washington
7.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fort Washington
2.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fort Washington
5.2

How Friendly Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Friendly Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.51.5This tracttract 801313Fort Washington: 6.46.4Fort Washingtonparent cityCounty: 3.53.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.63.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 52

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 279Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 29.76%Avg annual filing rate
  • 57.6%Peak (2016)
  • 91Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2011 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 240338013132011: 56 filings (18.30/100 renter HHs)2012: 51 filings (16.67/100 renter HHs)2014: 81 filings (26.47/100 renter HHs)2016: 91 filings (57.59/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 63% over the past 4 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Friendly Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Friendly Hills

The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 7.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Fort Washington eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Prince George's County average of 6.9 and above the Maryland statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is Black and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 52nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

In CDC survey modeling, about 15.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 8.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 24033801313

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 24033801313?

Census tract 24033801313 in the Friendly Hills neighborhood scores 1.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 24033801313?

Median gross rent is $2,096/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 96% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 24033801313?

0.8% of residents in tract 24033801313 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,319.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 24033801313?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 52th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 37th, household 50th, minority 90th, housing 54th.
Q5

Is tract 24033801313 considered part of Friendly Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 24033801313 fall within Friendly Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 24033801313?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 279 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 24033801313 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 29.76% of renter households, peaking at 57.6% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 24033801313 struggle to pay rent?

About 15.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 24033801313 compare to Fort Washington overall?

Tract 24033801313 scores 1.5/10, lower than the parent city of Fort Washington at 6.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fort Washington eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Fort Washington

Top eight tracts in Fort Washington ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related