Skip to content
Fort Washington, Maryland eviction risk overview
Ranked #533 of 1,865 nationally

Fort Washington, MD Eviction Risk: ELEVATED

Prince George's County · Population 25,134

In 2026
Risk score
6.4
ELEVATED

92th percentile, Maryland.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.3 Average3.8 Now6.4
7.2 2.3 1976 · score 2.4 1977 · score 2.4 1978 · score 2.4 1979 · score 2.4 1980 · score 2.5 1981 · score 2.5 1982 · score 2.6 1983 · score 2.5 1984 · score 2.4 1985 · score 2.3 1986 · score 2.4 1987 · score 2.4 1988 · score 2.4 1989 · score 2.4 1990 · score 2.5 1991 · score 2.6 1992 · score 3.0 1993 · score 3.0 1994 · score 3.0 1995 · score 3.0 1996 · score 3.1 1997 · score 3.1 1998 · score 3.2 1999 · score 3.2 2000 · score 3.2 2001 · score 3.3 2002 · score 3.4 2003 · score 3.4 2004 · score 3.4 2005 · score 3.4 2006 · score 3.5 2007 · score 3.5 2008 · score 4.1 2009 · score 4.3 2010 · score 4.4 2011 · score 4.5 2012 · score 4.5 2013 · score 4.6 2014 · score 4.6 2015 · score 4.6 2016 · score 4.7 2017 · score 4.7 2018 · score 4.8 2019 · score 4.9 2020 · score 6.9 2021 · score 7.2 2022 · score 6.6 2023 · score 6.3 2024 · score 6.6 2025 · score 6.4 2026 · score 6.4

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 9.1 Regional 9.1 State 5.7 Economic 5.4 Supply 6.2 Rent Control 7.2 Eviction 5.3 Tenant 2.7 Housing 5.2 6.4 ELEVATED
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +75.1% (2024)
    9.1
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    9.1
  3. State political climate
    Maryland legislature & governorship
    5.7
  4. Economic stress
    5.4% poverty · 6.4% unemp.
    5.4
  5. Supply constraint
    $2,690 average · 8.7% renters
    6.2
  6. Rent Control risk
    31.3% of income on rent
    7.2
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    156 days filing → judgment
    5.3
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    8.7% renters
    2.7
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    5.2
Geographic context

Risk heat across Fort Washington and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Fort Washington compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Prince George's County
Elevated
#32 of 82 cities
Rank in county, 62nd percentileLowHigh
#32 of 82 cities in Prince George's County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Maryland
Very High
#53 of 532 cities
Rank in state, 90th percentileLowHigh
#53 of 532 cities in Maryland for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Fort Washington risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Fort Washington: 6.46.4Fort WashingtonThis cityCounty: 6.46.4Countyavg in countyState: 6.26.2Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 6.4
    / 10 · ELEVATED
    The verdict

    A Elevated-tier market.

    Composite 6.4/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+4.0 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 156d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $2,690/mo. A contested eviction takes 156 days and costs $6,618–$13,801 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 8.7%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 25,134 residents, 8.7% rent. 31% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 5.4% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 9.1
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Strong-tenant coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 9.1 and 9.1 (Dem margin +75.1% (2024)). State climate at 5.7, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 5.7
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 5.7/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 5.3, housing court bias 5.2, rent-control risk 7.2. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +0.3 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 5.4
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 5.4. Supply constraint: 6.2. The numbers behind those: 5.4% poverty, 6.4% unemployment, 31% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Fort Washington sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Baltimore, MD · 147d · ~$11.8k all-in ($80/day) · score 6.7 Baltimore Columbia, MD · 136d · ~$11.5k all-in ($85/day) · score 6.1 Columbia Germantown, MD · 153d · ~$11.8k all-in ($77/day) · score 6.2 Germantown Waldorf, MD · 143d · ~$12.4k all-in ($87/day) · score 6.2 Waldorf Silver Spring, MD · 147d · ~$11.0k all-in ($75/day) · score 6.5 Silver Spring Ellicott City, MD · 143d · ~$11.1k all-in ($78/day) · score 6.2 Ellicott City Glen Burnie, MD · 157d · ~$11.7k all-in ($75/day) · score 6.2 Glen Burnie Gaithersburg, MD · 145d · ~$10.8k all-in ($74/day) · score 6.3 Gaithersburg Bethesda, MD · 143d · ~$11.8k all-in ($83/day) · score 6 Bethesda Rockville, MD · 150d · ~$11.0k all-in ($73/day) · score 6.4 Rockville Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Fort Washington
Fort Washington · 156d · ~$10.2k all-in ($65/day) · score 6.4 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Fort Washington, MD

Landlording in Fort Washington, Maryland, presents an elevated-friction market where documented notices and proactive screening matter. The Eviction Risk Score is 6.4/10 (ELEVATED tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Elevated-friction market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Fort Washington is a city of 25,134 residents where 8.7% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 31.3% of income on rent. At an average rent of $2,690/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Fort Washington eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 5.3/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Fort Washington closes 156 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Fort Washington's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 5.2/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Fort Washington runs $6,618 to $13,801 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 156 days of typical timeline and $2,690/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 2.7/10 in Fort Washington, and the city carries meaningful rent control exposure (7.2/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Maryland, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Fort Washington: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a ELEVATED tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Maryland's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $13,801 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Fort Washington

Trap · PRACTICAL TRAP
Cost-versus-timeline trade-off: at 156 days and roughly $13,801 on the high end, cash-for-keys at $5,520 to $8,280 typically beats the legal route for non-aggravated cases. Tenant defenses available under Real Property 8-401 can extend this materially.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant for any reason in Fort Washington?

No, not "any" reason. While Maryland doesn't have statewide just-cause eviction, you still need a legal basis. This is typically non-payment of rent, lease violations, or the expiration of a lease term where you don't wish to renew. For non-payment, you need a 10-day notice. For other issues, notice periods vary.

Q2

What if my tenant has a housing voucher (Section 8)?

Maryland has source-of-income protection, meaning you cannot refuse to rent to someone solely because they use a housing voucher. You must apply the same screening criteria to all applicants. If they meet your criteria (credit, rental history, etc.), you cannot deny them due to the voucher.

Q3

How long do I have to return a security deposit in Maryland?

You have 45 days from the date the tenant moves out to return the security deposit or provide a written, itemized list of deductions. Missing this deadline can result in serious penalties, including owing the tenant up to three times the deposit amount.

Q4

Is rent control a risk in Fort Washington?

Currently, there is no statewide rent control in Maryland, and Fort Washington does not have local rent control ordinances. However, the rent-control-risk sub-score for Fort Washington is 7.2/10, indicating a higher potential for future rent control measures to be considered. Stay informed on legislative changes. Our Maryland rent control rules page has more information.

Q5

What's the best way to handle a tenant who won't leave after the lease ends?

If a tenant stays past the lease end without your permission, they become a "holdover tenant." You generally need to serve a notice to vacate, and if they still don't leave, you'll need to file for eviction in court. Self-help evictions (changing locks, turning off utilities) are illegal and will put you in serious legal trouble.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 6.4/10 places Fort Washington in the 92nd percentile of Maryland cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.