Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #16,032 of 84,120 nationally

Montage at Danforth Green Eviction Risk: Elevated , Cochituate

Tract 25017383700 · Middlesex County, MA · pop 5,237 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

With a score of 6.4/10, tract 25017383700 in the Montage at Danforth Green area of Framingham, MA reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 8.7/10.

Risk score
6.4
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 12% Stable renters 19% Owners 69%
Tract context
Occupied units2,102
Renter share31.1%
SVI overall0.21
Poverty rate5.7%
Median income$115,950

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Montage at Danforth Green
Very High
Within parent city
27 th percentile
Rank, 27th percentileLowHigh
#12 of 16 tracts In Cochituate
Low
Within county
58 th percentile
Rank, 58th percentileLowHigh
#150 of 357 tracts In Middlesex County
Elevated
Within state
55 th percentile
Rank, 55th percentileLowHigh
#725 of 1,613 tracts In Massachusetts
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Cochituate and the region

Centroid at 42.3161, -71.3957 · click any tract to drill in

Why Montage at Danforth Green scores 6.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Cochituate
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.3
State political climate
Massachusetts legislature & governorship
6.2
Economic stress
5.7% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$2,069 rent vs county FMR
2.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cochituate
7.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cochituate
8.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cochituate
6.5

How Montage at Danforth Green compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Montage at Danforth Green risk score vs. parent city / county / state6.4This tracttract 3837004.0Cochituateparent city6.3Countyavg tract in county6.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 21

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 31Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 1.34%Avg annual filing rate
  • 1.8%Peak (2014)
  • 6Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2012 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 25017383700
Filings climbed 20% over the past 5 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 0Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2023-11-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Boston, MA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Montage at Danforth Green. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Montage at Danforth Green

Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1.4/10. Severe burden reaches 15%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 2.3/10.

Food insecurity runs 8.9% against 17.8% nationally. Court records carry 31 eviction filings across 5 observed years. Adults with no health insurance runs 3.9% against 11.3% nationally.

Filings peaked in 2014 at 1.8% of renter households. In a typical year about 1.3% of renter households face a filing.

Nationally it ranks #16,032 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2.9/10.

Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 6%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. 40% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 25017383700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 25017383700?

Census tract 25017383700 in the Montage at Danforth Green neighborhood scores 6.4/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 25017383700?

Median gross rent is $2,069/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 40% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 25017383700?

5.7% of residents in tract 25017383700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,237.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 25017383700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 21th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 17th, household 19th, minority 42th, housing 40th.
Q5

Is tract 25017383700 considered part of Montage at Danforth Green?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 25017383700 fall within Montage at Danforth Green (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 25017383700?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 31 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 25017383700 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.34% of renter households, peaking at 1.8% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 25017383700 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 25017383700 compare to Cochituate overall?

Tract 25017383700 scores 6.4/10, higher than the parent city of Cochituate at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cochituate; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Cochituate

Top eight tracts in Cochituate ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related