Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #79,998 of 84,120 nationally
Montage at Danforth Green Eviction Risk: Lower , Cochituate
Tract 25017366100 · Middlesex County, MA · pop 4,832 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi
Census tract 25017366100 sits in Montage at Danforth Green in Cochituate, Massachusetts eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 4.6/10. That is riskier than roughly 26% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 41% of renter households, a severe level, and 24% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,337 monthly, set against $178,438 in average yearly household income, roughly 9% of income at the averages. About 18% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
1.4
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8%
Stable renters 11%
Owners 81%
Tract context
Occupied units1,776
Renter share18.2%
SVI overall0.27
Poverty rate7.6%
Median income$178,438
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Within county
20
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
11
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Cochituate and the region
Centroid at 42.3256, -71.3664 · click any tract to drill in
Why Montage at Danforth Green scores 1.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Cochituate
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.3
State political climate
Massachusetts legislature & governorship
6.2
Economic stress
7.6% poverty · this tract
1.9
Supply constraint
$1,337 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cochituate
3.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cochituate
3.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cochituate
2.7
How Montage at Danforth Green compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 27
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 7%Socioeconomic
- 59%Household composition
- 34%Racial/ethnic minority
- 53%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 19Total filings over 5 yrs
- 1.24%Avg annual filing rate
- 1.5%Peak (2015)
- 5Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 150% over the past 5 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 0Total filings 2020-21
- 0.0Avg monthly (observed)
- 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Boston, MA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Montage at Danforth Green. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.6%Housing insecurity
- 4.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 6.8%Food insecurity
- 7.3%SNAP enrollment
- 4.9%Transit barriers
- 2.7%No health insurance
- 13.0%Frequent mental distress
- 22.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Montage at Danforth Green
What moves this score most is eviction process difficulty at 6.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Cochituate, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Middlesex County average of 5.2 and below the Massachusetts statewide average of 5.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 27th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
In CDC survey modeling, about 6.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 25017366100
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 25017366100?
Census tract 25017366100 in the Montage at Danforth Green neighborhood scores 1.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 25017366100?
Median gross rent is $1,337/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 41% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 25017366100?
7.6% of residents in tract 25017366100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,832.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 25017366100?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 27th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 7th, household 59th, minority 34th, housing 53th.
Q5
Is tract 25017366100 considered part of Montage at Danforth Green?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 25017366100 fall within Montage at Danforth Green (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 25017366100?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 19 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 25017366100 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.24% of renter households, peaking at 1.5% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 25017366100 struggle to pay rent?
About 6.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 25017366100 compare to Cochituate overall?
Tract 25017366100 scores 1.4/10, lower than the parent city of Cochituate at 5.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cochituate; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Cochituate
Top eight tracts in Cochituate ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related