Foster Eviction Risk: Moderate , Lansing
Tract 26065001000 · Ingham County, MI · pop 2,120 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
Tract 26065001000 covers Foster in Lansing in Michigan. Home to 2,120 residents, it scores 6.2/10 on landlord eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #16,523 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
About 50% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 25% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,113 monthly, set against $57,399 in average yearly household income, roughly 23% of income at the averages. Renters make up 42% of occupied homes.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Lansing and the region
Centroid at 42.7354, -84.5153 · click any tract to drill in
Why Foster scores 4.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Foster compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 49
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 66%Socioeconomic
- 20%Household composition
- 41%Racial/ethnic minority
- 47%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 49%Grade B
- 13%Grade C
- 30%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 11.9%Housing insecurity
- 8.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 14.5%Food insecurity
- 13.8%SNAP enrollment
- 8.7%Transit barriers
- 7.0%No health insurance
- 18.7%Frequent mental distress
- 29.0%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Foster
The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Lansing eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Ingham County average of 6.2 and above the Michigan statewide average of 5.7. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
Part of this tract, about 30% of its area, sat in the redlined grade-D zone on 1930s HOLC maps, though its dominant grade was B ("Still Desirable"). That lending history still correlates with present-day rent burden.
In CDC survey modeling, about 11.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 8.9% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
About tract 26065001000
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26065001000?
What is the average rent in tract 26065001000?
What is the poverty rate in tract 26065001000?
How socially vulnerable is tract 26065001000?
Is tract 26065001000 considered part of Foster?
What share of households in tract 26065001000 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 26065001000 compare to Lansing overall?
Was tract 26065001000 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Lansing
Top eight tracts in Lansing ranked by composite eviction-risk score.