Neighborhood · Ranked #35,899 of 84,120 nationally

Forest View Eviction Risk: Moderate , Lansing

Tract 26065002901 · Ingham County, MI · pop 3,413 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

Here is how census tract 26065002901, in the Forest View area of Lansing eviction risk, looks to a landlord: a 6.1/10 eviction-risk score (Elevated tier) across a population of 3,413. That is riskier than about 78% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 60% of renter households, a severe level, and 46% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,086 a month against an average household income of $65,536 a year, roughly 20% of income at the averages. About 39% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score

4.3

Moderate

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 23% Stable renters 16% Owners 61%

Tract context

Occupied units1,596

Renter share38.9%

SVI overall0.41

Poverty rate13.0%

Median income$65,536

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Lansing and the region

Centroid at 42.7014, -84.5158 · click any tract to drill in

Why Forest View scores 4.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Lansing

6.0

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

6.6

State political climate

Michigan legislature & governorship

3.3

Economic stress

13.0% poverty · this tract

3.2

Supply constraint

$1,086 rent vs county FMR

4.6

Rent control risk

Inherited from Lansing

2.0

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

4.5

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Lansing

5.0

Housing court bias

Inherited from Lansing

4.5

How Forest View compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 41

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

52%Socioeconomic
10%Household composition
45%Racial/ethnic minority
57%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

0%Grade A
0%Grade B
19%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Forest View. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

11.9%Housing insecurity
8.7%Utility-shutoff threat
13.9%Food insecurity
12.8%SNAP enrollment
8.3%Transit barriers
6.3%No health insurance
17.6%Frequent mental distress
28.0%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Forest View

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Lansing eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Ingham County average of 6.2 and above the Michigan statewide average of 5.7. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of C ("Declining"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.

In CDC survey modeling, about 11.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 8.7% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 26065002901

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26065002901?

Census tract 26065002901 in the Forest View neighborhood scores 4.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 26065002901?

Median gross rent is $1,086/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 60% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 26065002901?

13.0% of residents in tract 26065002901 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,413.

How socially vulnerable is tract 26065002901?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 41th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 52th, household 10th, minority 45th, housing 57th.

Is tract 26065002901 considered part of Forest View?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 26065002901 fall within Forest View (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 26065002901 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 26065002901 compare to Lansing overall?

Tract 26065002901 scores 4.3/10, higher than the parent city of Lansing at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lansing eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Was tract 26065002901 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Lansing

Top eight tracts in Lansing ranked by composite eviction-risk score.