River Forest Eviction Risk: Moderate , Lansing
Tract 26065003301 · Ingham County, MI · pop 3,148 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
Tract 26065003301 sits in the River Forest area of Lansing eviction risk, MI, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5.4/10. It is home to 3,148 residents. The dominant input is court filing pressure at 9.4/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Lansing and the region
Centroid at 42.7655, -84.5872 · click any tract to drill in
Why River Forest scores 5.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow River Forest compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 78
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 81%Socioeconomic
- 90%Household composition
- 66%Racial/ethnic minority
- 41%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 100%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within River Forest. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 18.8%Housing insecurity
- 14.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 24.7%Food insecurity
- 25.9%SNAP enrollment
- 13.1%Transit barriers
- 9.7%No health insurance
- 20.5%Frequent mental distress
- 36.4%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in River Forest
22% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1.5/10. The poverty rate is 30%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.
At $735 a month, rents run 26% under what the rest of Lansing commands. Running cool, rent-regulation exposure reads 2/10. SNAP participation runs 25.9% against 15.2% nationally.
Against the Ingham County average of 4.6, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 0.8 points. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 14.8% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.
This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Lansing. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. On the national scale it lands near the 70th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Social vulnerability reads 8/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 26065003301
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26065003301?
What is the average rent in tract 26065003301?
What is the poverty rate in tract 26065003301?
How socially vulnerable is tract 26065003301?
Is tract 26065003301 considered part of River Forest?
What share of households in tract 26065003301 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 26065003301 compare to Lansing overall?
Was tract 26065003301 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Lansing
Top eight tracts in Lansing ranked by composite eviction-risk score.