Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #24,859 of 84,120 nationally

River Forest Eviction Risk: Moderate , Lansing

Tract 26065003301 · Ingham County, MI · pop 3,148 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

Tract 26065003301 sits in the River Forest area of Lansing eviction risk, MI, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5.4/10. It is home to 3,148 residents. The dominant input is court filing pressure at 9.4/10.

Risk score
5.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16% Stable renters 20% Owners 64%
Tract context
Occupied units1,265
Renter share36.6%
SVI overall0.78
Poverty rate29.8%
Median income$52,538

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In River Forest
Very High
Within parent city
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#11 of 41 tracts In Lansing
High
Within county
81 th percentile
Rank, 81st percentileLowHigh
#17 of 84 tracts In Ingham County
High
Within state
82 th percentile
Rank, 82nd percentileLowHigh
#527 of 2,972 tracts In Michigan
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Lansing and the region

Centroid at 42.7655, -84.5872 · click any tract to drill in

Why River Forest scores 5.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Lansing
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Michigan legislature & governorship
3.3
Economic stress
29.8% poverty · this tract
7.4
Supply constraint
$735 rent vs county FMR
1.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lansing
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lansing
5.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lansing
4.5

How River Forest compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
River Forest risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.4This tracttract 0033014.0Lansingparent city4.6Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 78

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within River Forest. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in River Forest

22% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1.5/10. The poverty rate is 30%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

At $735 a month, rents run 26% under what the rest of Lansing commands. Running cool, rent-regulation exposure reads 2/10. SNAP participation runs 25.9% against 15.2% nationally.

Against the Ingham County average of 4.6, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 0.8 points. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 14.8% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.

This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Lansing. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. On the national scale it lands near the 70th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Social vulnerability reads 8/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 26065003301

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26065003301?

Census tract 26065003301 in the River Forest neighborhood scores 5.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 26065003301?

Median gross rent is $735/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 44% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 26065003301?

29.8% of residents in tract 26065003301 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,148.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 26065003301?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 78th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 81th, household 90th, minority 66th, housing 41th.
Q5

Is tract 26065003301 considered part of River Forest?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 26065003301 fall within River Forest (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 26065003301 struggle to pay rent?

About 18.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 26065003301 compare to Lansing overall?

Tract 26065003301 scores 5.4/10, higher than the parent city of Lansing at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lansing eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 26065003301 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Lansing

Top eight tracts in Lansing ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related