Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #65,414 of 84,120 nationally

Lincoln Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Beverly Hills

Tract 26125152700 · Oakland County, MI · pop 3,016 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

Census tract 26125152700 covers part of the Lincoln Hills area of Birmingham, MI, and scores 3.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,016. 68% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, far above the Oakland County average of 39.8%.

Risk score
3.1
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 2% Owners 93%
Tract context
Occupied units1,081
Renter share7.5%
SVI overall0.13
Poverty rate7.5%
Median income$168,029

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Lincoln Hills
Very High
Within parent city
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 7 tracts In Beverly Hills
Elevated
Within county
31 th percentile
Rank, 31st percentileLowHigh
#241 of 350 tracts In Oakland County
Low
Within state
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#2,108 of 2,972 tracts In Michigan
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Beverly Hills and the region

Centroid at 42.5384, -83.2355 · click any tract to drill in

Why Lincoln Hills scores 3.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Beverly Hills
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Michigan legislature & governorship
3.3
Economic stress
7.5% poverty · this tract
1.9
Supply constraint
$2,669 rent vs county FMR
10.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Beverly Hills
4.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Beverly Hills
5.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Beverly Hills
3.7

How Lincoln Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Lincoln Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.1This tracttract 1527003.4Beverly Hillsparent city4.0Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 13

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: A: Best

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Lincoln Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Lincoln Hills

The dominant input is supply constraint at 10/10. 35% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. The voucher gap is 93.7%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

At $2,669 a month, rents run 40% over what the rest of Birmingham commands. On the high side, court filing pressure reads 9.5/10. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1.9/10.

Housing insecurity runs 4.9% against 14.2% nationally. Against the Oakland County average of 4.0, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.9 points. Adults with no health insurance runs 2.9% against 11.3% nationally.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground A ("Best"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. That is riskier than roughly 22% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

At 7% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2.2/10.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 26125152700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26125152700?

Census tract 26125152700 in the Lincoln Hills neighborhood scores 3.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 26125152700?

Median gross rent is $2,669/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 68% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 26125152700?

7.5% of residents in tract 26125152700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,016.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 26125152700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 13th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 16th, household 54th, minority 21th, housing 10th.
Q5

Is tract 26125152700 considered part of Lincoln Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 26125152700 fall within Lincoln Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 26125152700 struggle to pay rent?

About 4.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 26125152700 compare to Beverly Hills overall?

Tract 26125152700 scores 3.1/10, lower than the parent city of Beverly Hills at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Beverly Hills; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 26125152700 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Beverly Hills

Top eight tracts in Beverly Hills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related