Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #24,859 of 84,120 nationally

Ivanhoe Southwest Eviction Risk: Moderate , Kansas City

Tract 29095016900 · Jackson County, MO · pop 2,312 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Census tract 29095016900 covers part of the Ivanhoe Southwest area of Kansas City, MO, and scores 5.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,312. What pushes it up most is economic stress at 9.4/10.

Risk score
5.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 17% Stable renters 38% Owners 45%
Tract context
Occupied units1,075
Renter share54.6%
SVI overall0.83
Poverty rate37.5%
Median income$40,911

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Ivanhoe Southwest
Very Low
Within parent city
83 th percentile
Rank, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#28 of 163 tracts In Kansas City
High
Within county
74 th percentile
Rank, 74th percentileLowHigh
#59 of 227 tracts In Jackson County
Elevated
Within state
96 th percentile
Rank, 96th percentileLowHigh
#68 of 1,654 tracts In Missouri
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Kansas City and the region

Centroid at 39.0522, -94.5630 · click any tract to drill in

Why Ivanhoe Southwest scores 5.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Kansas City
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.1
State political climate
Missouri legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
37.5% poverty · this tract
9.4
Supply constraint
$853 rent vs county FMR
1.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Kansas City
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Kansas City
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Kansas City
4.0

How Ivanhoe Southwest compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Ivanhoe Southwest risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.45.4This tracttract 016900Kansas City: 4.04.0Kansas Cityparent cityCounty: 4.24.2Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 83

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 978Total filings over 14 yrs
  • 15.95%Avg annual filing rate
  • 31.7%Peak (2008)
  • 78Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2003 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 290950169002003: 66 filings (11.91/100 renter HHs)2004: 56 filings (10.11/100 renter HHs)2005: 72 filings (20.00/100 renter HHs)2006: 91 filings (25.28/100 renter HHs)2007: 71 filings (19.72/100 renter HHs)2008: 114 filings (31.67/100 renter HHs)2009: 78 filings (21.67/100 renter HHs)2010: 58 filings (10.88/100 renter HHs)2011: 53 filings (10.66/100 renter HHs)2012: 53 filings (10.66/100 renter HHs)2013: 61 filings (12.27/100 renter HHs)2014: 53 filings (10.66/100 renter HHs)2015: 74 filings (14.89/100 renter HHs)2017: 78 filings (12.89/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 18% over the past 14 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 347Total filings 2020-21
  • 4.5Avg monthly (observed)
  • 4.6Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.98×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 8 filings (1.78× baseline)2020-02-01: 3 filings (0.71× baseline)2020-03-01: 4 filings (0.89× baseline)2020-04-01: 2 filings (0.44× baseline)2020-05-01: 2 filings (0.33× baseline)2020-06-01: 4 filings (0.62× baseline)2020-07-01: 4 filings (0.73× baseline)2020-08-01: 5 filings (1.33× baseline)2020-09-01: 3 filings (0.50× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (0.22× baseline)2020-11-01: 4 filings (0.73× baseline)2020-12-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2021-01-01: 3 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-02-01: 3 filings (0.71× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (0.22× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (0.22× baseline)2021-05-01: 2 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-06-01: 10 filings (1.54× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (0.18× baseline)2021-08-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2021-09-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (0.22× baseline)2021-11-01: 4 filings (0.73× baseline)2021-12-01: 5 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-01-01: 4 filings (0.89× baseline)2022-02-01: 5 filings (1.18× baseline)2022-03-01: 6 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-04-01: 3 filings (0.67× baseline)2022-05-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2022-06-01: 4 filings (0.62× baseline)2022-07-01: 8 filings (1.45× baseline)2022-08-01: 6 filings (1.60× baseline)2022-09-01: 3 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-10-01: 2 filings (0.44× baseline)2022-11-01: 6 filings (1.09× baseline)2022-12-01: 3 filings (0.80× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (0.22× baseline)2023-02-01: 8 filings (1.88× baseline)2023-03-01: 7 filings (1.56× baseline)2023-04-01: 8 filings (1.78× baseline)2023-05-01: 10 filings (1.67× baseline)2023-06-01: 6 filings (0.92× baseline)2023-07-01: 9 filings (1.64× baseline)2023-08-01: 12 filings (3.20× baseline)2023-09-01: 7 filings (1.17× baseline)2023-10-01: 5 filings (1.11× baseline)2023-11-01: 11 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 7 filings (1.87× baseline)2024-01-01: 3 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-02-01: 4 filings (0.94× baseline)2024-03-01: 8 filings (1.78× baseline)2024-04-01: 5 filings (1.11× baseline)2024-05-01: 12 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 6 filings (0.92× baseline)2024-07-01: 5 filings (0.91× baseline)2024-08-01: 6 filings (1.60× baseline)2024-09-01: 2 filings (0.33× baseline)2024-10-01: 6 filings (1.33× baseline)2024-11-01: 4 filings (0.73× baseline)2024-12-01: 5 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-01-01: 2 filings (0.44× baseline)2025-02-01: 4 filings (0.94× baseline)2025-03-01: 4 filings (0.89× baseline)2025-04-01: 2 filings (0.44× baseline)2025-05-01: 4 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-06-01: 2 filings (0.31× baseline)2025-07-01: 9 filings (1.64× baseline)2025-08-01: 8 filings (2.13× baseline)2025-09-01: 3 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-10-01: 6 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (0.18× baseline)2025-12-01: 3 filings (0.80× baseline)2026-01-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Kansas City, MO as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Ivanhoe Southwest. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Ivanhoe Southwest

The poverty rate is 38%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. Against Jackson County at 43.0%, 31% of renters here are cost-burdened.

The severe-burden share is 24%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 1.3/10. Average gross rent is $853, 31% below the Kansas City average.

Inability to pay a utility bill runs 24.6% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. Running cool, rent-regulation exposure reads 1.5/10. Disability prevalence runs 45.5% against 31.5% nationally.

It sits 1.2 points above the Jackson County average of 4.2. The filing record is not thin: 978 evictions over 14 years of observation.

The worst year on record was 2008, when 31.7% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 15.9% of renter households face a filing.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 29095016900

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 29095016900?

Census tract 29095016900 in the Ivanhoe Southwest neighborhood scores 5.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 29095016900?

Median gross rent is $853/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 31% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 29095016900?

37.5% of residents in tract 29095016900 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,312.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 29095016900?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 83th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 77th, household 91th, minority 94th, housing 56th.
Q5

Is tract 29095016900 considered part of Ivanhoe Southwest?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 29095016900 fall within Ivanhoe Southwest (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 29095016900?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 978 eviction filings across 14 validated years in tract 29095016900 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 15.95% of renter households, peaking at 31.7% in 2008. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 29095016900 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.98× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Kansas City eviction risk, MO), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 29095016900 struggle to pay rent?

About 30.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 24.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 29095016900 compare to Kansas City overall?

Tract 29095016900 scores 5.4/10, higher than the parent city of Kansas City at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Kansas City eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 29095016900 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 69% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Kansas City

Top eight tracts in Kansas City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related