Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #46,312 of 84,120 nationally

St. John Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 29189213500 · St. Louis County, MO · pop 5,365 · 88% of tract blocks fall in St. John

Census tract 29189213500 sits in St. John, Missouri eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 5.3/10. That is riskier than roughly 49% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

64% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 32% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,164 a month while the average household earns $51,401 a year, roughly 27% of income at the averages. Renters make up 41% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 26% Stable renters 14% Owners 60%
Tract context
Occupied units2,300
Renter share40.6%
SVI overall0.70
Poverty rate11.1%
Median income$51,401

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In St. John
Moderate
Within county
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#59 of 236 tracts In St. Louis County
High
Within state
48 th percentile
Rank, 48th percentileLowHigh
#859 of 1,654 tracts In Missouri
Moderate
National
45 th percentile
Rank, 45th percentileLowHigh
#46,312 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across St. John and the region

Centroid at 38.7149, -90.3446 · click any tract to drill in

Why St. John scores 3.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from St. John
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.2
State political climate
Missouri legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
11.1% poverty · this tract
2.8
Supply constraint
$1,164 rent vs county FMR
4.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from St. John
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from St. John
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from St. John
2.4

How St. John compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
St. John risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.73.7This tracttract 213500St. John: 2.62.6St. Johnparent cityCounty: 2.82.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 70

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 385Total filings over 8 yrs
  • 9.32%Avg annual filing rate
  • 12.9%Peak (2012)
  • 55Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2003 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 291892135002003: 34 filings (8.06/100 renter HHs)2004: 48 filings (11.38/100 renter HHs)2005: 32 filings (6.53/100 renter HHs)2006: 48 filings (9.80/100 renter HHs)2010: 50 filings (9.84/100 renter HHs)2012: 69 filings (12.85/100 renter HHs)2013: 49 filings (9.12/100 renter HHs)2017: 55 filings (6.95/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 62% over the past 8 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 348Total filings 2020-21
  • 4.5Avg monthly (observed)
  • 4.5Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.01×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 5 filings (0.77× baseline)2020-02-01: 6 filings (6.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 5 filings (0.91× baseline)2020-04-01: 1 filings (0.22× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 2 filings (0.33× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (0.22× baseline)2020-08-01: 5 filings (0.77× baseline)2020-09-01: 3 filings (0.43× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2020-11-01: 2 filings (4.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 5 filings (1.43× baseline)2021-01-01: 2 filings (0.31× baseline)2021-02-01: 5 filings (5.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2021-06-01: 6 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 4 filings (0.89× baseline)2021-08-01: 4 filings (0.62× baseline)2021-09-01: 8 filings (1.14× baseline)2021-10-01: 4 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-11-01: 4 filings (8.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 4 filings (1.14× baseline)2022-01-01: 2 filings (0.31× baseline)2022-02-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 4 filings (0.73× baseline)2022-04-01: 3 filings (0.67× baseline)2022-05-01: 8 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-06-01: 6 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 4 filings (0.89× baseline)2022-08-01: 2 filings (0.31× baseline)2022-09-01: 6 filings (0.86× baseline)2022-10-01: 8 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-11-01: 6 filings (12.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 13 filings (3.71× baseline)2023-01-01: 6 filings (0.92× baseline)2023-02-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 6 filings (1.09× baseline)2023-04-01: 3 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-05-01: 5 filings (0.83× baseline)2023-06-01: 3 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-07-01: 4 filings (0.89× baseline)2023-08-01: 6 filings (0.92× baseline)2023-09-01: 13 filings (1.86× baseline)2023-10-01: 10 filings (1.67× baseline)2023-11-01: 7 filings (14.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 9 filings (2.57× baseline)2024-01-01: 3 filings (0.46× baseline)2024-02-01: 6 filings (6.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 3 filings (0.55× baseline)2024-04-01: 6 filings (1.33× baseline)2024-05-01: 6 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 4 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-07-01: 13 filings (2.89× baseline)2024-08-01: 7 filings (1.08× baseline)2024-09-01: 5 filings (0.71× baseline)2024-10-01: 4 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-11-01: 4 filings (8.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 6 filings (1.71× baseline)2025-01-01: 7 filings (1.08× baseline)2025-02-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 2 filings (0.36× baseline)2025-04-01: 7 filings (1.56× baseline)2025-05-01: 6 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 4 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-07-01: 9 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 3 filings (0.46× baseline)2025-09-01: 3 filings (0.43× baseline)2025-10-01: 2 filings (0.33× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2026-01-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Southwest Oregon, OR as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in St. John

The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 4.6/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from St. John, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the St. Louis County average of 5.6 and above the Missouri statewide average of 4.8. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of C ("Declining"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 385 eviction filings here over 8 tracked years, with about 9.3% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 12.9% of renter households in 2012.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 29189213500

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 29189213500?

Census tract 29189213500 in St. John scores 3.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 29189213500?

Median gross rent is $1,164/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 64% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 29189213500?

11.1% of residents in tract 29189213500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,365.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 29189213500?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 70th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 88th, household 58th, minority 70th, housing 30th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 29189213500?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 385 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 29189213500 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 9.32% of renter households, peaking at 12.9% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 29189213500 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.01× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Southwest Oregon eviction laws, OR), 2020-2021.
Q7

What share of households in tract 29189213500 struggle to pay rent?

About 21.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 16.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 29189213500 compare to St. John overall?

Tract 29189213500 scores 3.7/10, higher than the parent city of St. John at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from St. John; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 29189213500 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Related