Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #28,017 of 84,120 nationally

Franklin to the Fort Eviction Risk: Moderate , Missoula

Tract 30063001001 · Missoula County, MT · pop 3,554 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

For landlords sizing up the Franklin to the Fort area of Missoula, census tract 30063001001 carries a moderate eviction-risk score of 5.5/10. It lands near the 57th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 59% of renter households, a severe level, and 31% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,257 monthly, set against $54,423 in average yearly household income, roughly 28% of income at the averages. About 48% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
4.8
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 28% Stable renters 20% Owners 52%
Tract context
Occupied units1,696
Renter share47.6%
SVI overall0.67
Poverty rate16.3%
Median income$54,423

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Franklin to the Fort
Very High
Within parent city
82 th percentile
Rank, 82nd percentileLowHigh
#4 of 18 tracts In Missoula
High
Within county
86 th percentile
Rank, 86th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 29 tracts In Missoula County
High
Within state
85 th percentile
Rank, 85th percentileLowHigh
#50 of 319 tracts In Montana
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Missoula and the region

Centroid at 46.8509, -114.0345 · click any tract to drill in

Why Franklin to the Fort scores 4.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Missoula
8.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.2
State political climate
Montana legislature & governorship
1.7
Economic stress
16.3% poverty · this tract
4.1
Supply constraint
$1,257 rent vs county FMR
2.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Missoula
4.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Missoula
6.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Missoula
5.5

How Franklin to the Fort compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Franklin to the Fort risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.84.8This tracttract 001001Missoula: 3.13.1Missoulaparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 67

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Franklin to the Fort. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Franklin to the Fort

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 6.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Missoula eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Missoula County average of 4.8 and above the Montana statewide average of 4.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 11.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 8.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 67th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 30063001001

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 30063001001?

Census tract 30063001001 in the Franklin to the Fort neighborhood scores 4.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 30063001001?

Median gross rent is $1,257/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 59% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 30063001001?

16.3% of residents in tract 30063001001 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,554.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 30063001001?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 67th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 55th, household 57th, minority 12th, housing 92th.
Q5

Is tract 30063001001 considered part of Franklin to the Fort?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 30063001001 fall within Franklin to the Fort (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 30063001001 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 30063001001 compare to Missoula overall?

Tract 30063001001 scores 4.8/10, higher than the parent city of Missoula at 3.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Missoula eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Missoula

Top eight tracts in Missoula ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related