Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #35,899 of 84,120 nationally

Franklin to the Fort Eviction Risk: Moderate , Missoula

Tract 30063001002 · Missoula County, MT · pop 1,990 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

With a score of 4.6/10, tract 30063001002 in the Franklin to the Fort area of Missoula ranks in the Moderate tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 1,990 residents. On the national scale it ranks #62,699 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 32% of renter households, a high level, and 17% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $986 a month against an average household income of $47,214 a year, roughly 25% of income at the averages. About 69% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
4.3
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 22% Stable renters 47% Owners 31%
Tract context
Occupied units1,059
Renter share69.1%
SVI overall0.45
Poverty rate6.7%
Median income$47,214

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 tracts In Franklin to the Fort
Very Low
Within parent city
41 th percentile
Rank, 41st percentileLowHigh
#11 of 18 tracts In Missoula
Moderate
Within county
61 th percentile
Rank, 61st percentileLowHigh
#12 of 29 tracts In Missoula County
Elevated
Within state
72 th percentile
Rank, 72nd percentileLowHigh
#89 of 319 tracts In Montana
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Missoula and the region

Centroid at 46.8503, -114.0252 · click any tract to drill in

Why Franklin to the Fort scores 4.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Missoula
8.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.2
State political climate
Montana legislature & governorship
1.7
Economic stress
6.7% poverty · this tract
1.7
Supply constraint
$986 rent vs county FMR
1.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Missoula
4.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Missoula
6.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Missoula
5.5

How Franklin to the Fort compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Franklin to the Fort risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.34.3This tracttract 001002Missoula: 3.13.1Missoulaparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 45

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Franklin to the Fort. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Franklin to the Fort

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 6.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Missoula eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Missoula County average of 4.8 and above the Montana statewide average of 4.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 8.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 45th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 30063001002

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 30063001002?

Census tract 30063001002 in the Franklin to the Fort neighborhood scores 4.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 30063001002?

Median gross rent is $986/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 32% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 30063001002?

6.7% of residents in tract 30063001002 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,990.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 30063001002?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 45th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 29th, household 34th, minority 43th, housing 78th.
Q5

Is tract 30063001002 considered part of Franklin to the Fort?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 30063001002 fall within Franklin to the Fort (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 30063001002 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 30063001002 compare to Missoula overall?

Tract 30063001002 scores 4.3/10, higher than the parent city of Missoula at 3.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Missoula eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Missoula

Top eight tracts in Missoula ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related